Scottish Archive
Network
Project Initiation Document
Agreed by
Heritage Lottery Fund
National Archives of Scotland
Scottish Archive Network
14/6/1999
Version 1.0
Ishbel Barnes
Contents__________________________________________________________________
1. BACKGROUND_________________________________________________________
2. PROJECT DEFINITIONS_________________________________________________
2.1 Project Objectives_____________________________________________________
2.2 Defined Method of Approach_____________________________________________
2.3 Project Deliverables and Desired Outcomes_______________________________
2.4 Project Scope________________________________________________________
2.5 Project Exclusions____________________________________________________
2.6 Project Interfaces_____________________________________________________
2.7 Date of start of project_________________________________________________
3. ASSUMPTIONS_________________________________________________________
4. INITIAL BUSINESS CASE_______________________________________________
5. PROJECT ORGANISATION STRUCTURE_________________________________
5.1 Project Board________________________________________________________
5.2 User Group__________________________________________________________
5.3 Participating Archive Group____________________________________________
5.4 Project Support_______________________________________________________
5.5 Four sub-projects:____________________________________________________
5.5.1 Sub-project 1. Top Level Finding Aids_____________________________________________
5.5.2 Sub-project 2. Special Archive Services_____________________________________________
5.5.3 Sub-project 3. Testaments_______________________________________________________
5.5.4 Sub-project 4. Information technology and communications_____________________________
6. PROJECT QUALITY PLAN______________________________________________
7. INITIAL PROJECT PLANS______________________________________________
8. PROJECT CONTROLS__________________________________________________
9. PROJECT CONSTRAINTS_______________________________________________
10. EXCEPTION PROCESS________________________________________________
11. RISK LOGS___________________________________________________________
12. COMMUNICATION STRATEGY_________________________________________
APPENDIX 1 LEGAL CONTRACTS_________________________________________
APPENDIX 2 TOP LEVEL PROJECT PLANS_________________________________
APPENDIX 3 INITIAL BUSINESS CASE_____________________________________
Business Case__________________________________________________________
Reasons________________________________________________________________________
Archive material is a Valuable but Hidden Resource_____________________________________
No Central Point of Access to What is held Where_____________________________________
Varied Standards of Automation in Scottish Archives___________________________________
Demand for extending availability__________________________________________________
Poor condition of Commissary Court Volumes_________________________________________
Benefits of the Project_____________________________________________________________
Widening the Use of Scottish Archives______________________________________________
Single/Common point of access____________________________________________________
Extending The “Opening Hours”___________________________________________________
Means of contact______________________________________________________________
More Queries Dealt With________________________________________________________
Digitisation to enhance preservation________________________________________________
Easier production______________________________________________________________
Security_____________________________________________________________________
Benefit Realisation________________________________________________________________
Service Availability_____________________________________________________________
Increased Use of Testaments_____________________________________________________
Increased Use of Archives_______________________________________________________
Prototype for other Developments__________________________________________________
Platform for Wider Availability of Scottish Archive Material______________________________
No Further Damage To Commissary Material__________________________________________
Cost & Timescale_________________________________________________________________
Appendix 3.1___________________________________________________________
Appendix 3.1.1 - SCAN Costs 2-7_____________________________________________________
Appendix 3.2 Descriptions and Summary_____________________________________
APPENDIX 4 JOB DESCRIPTIONS_________________________________________
Project Board___________________________________________________________
1. Project Manager Dr Ishbel Barnes Grade C1___________________________________________
Main responsibilities____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
2. Head of IT NAS Mr Rob Mildren Grade B3 (50% of working time)___________________________
Main responsibilities____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
3. NAS Liaison. Mr George MacKenzie Grade C1 ( 35 % of working time)_______________________
Main responsibilities____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
Project support Grade B1 To be appointed______________________________________________
Main responsibilities____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
APPENDIX 5 HEADINGS OF HERITAGE LOTTERY FUND MONTHLY REPORT
APPENDIX 6 TOP LEVEL FINDING AIDS___________________________________
1. Background__________________________________________________________
2. Sub-Project Definition__________________________________________________
2.1 Sub-Project Objectives__________________________________________________________
2.2 Defined Method of Approach_____________________________________________________
2.3 Sub-Project Deliverables and Desired Outcome________________________________________
2.4 Sub-Project Scope______________________________________________________________
2.5 Sub-Project Exclusions__________________________________________________________
2.6 Sub-Project Interfaces___________________________________________________________
2.7 Date of start of main project_______________________________________________________
3. Assumptions__________________________________________________________
4. Initial Business Case___________________________________________________
5. Sub-Project Organisation Structure________________________________________
6. Sub-Project Quality Plan________________________________________________
7. Initial Sub-Project Plans_________________________________________________
8. Sub-Project Controls___________________________________________________
9. Main Project Constraints________________________________________________
10. Exception Process____________________________________________________
11. Risk Logs___________________________________________________________
12. Communication Strategy_______________________________________________
APPENDIX 6.1 Detailed Project Plan (GANTT Chart)__________________________
Year 1__________________________________________________________________________
Year 2__________________________________________________________________________
Year 3__________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX 6.2 Job Descriptions___________________________________________
TLFA Team Leader Grade B3________________________________________________________
Main responsibility_____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
TLFA Project general staff Grade B1/2_________________________________________________
Main responsibility_____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
APPENDIX 6.3 Quality Assurance Plans_____________________________________
APPENDIX 6.4 Risk Log__________________________________________________
APPENDIX 7 TESTAMENTS_______________________________________________
1. Background__________________________________________________________
2. Project Definition_____________________________________________________
2.1 Sub-Project Objectives__________________________________________________________
2.2 Defined Method of Approach_____________________________________________________
2.3 Testaments Sub-Project Deliverables and Desired Outcome_______________________________
2.4 Sub-Project Scope______________________________________________________________
2.5 Sub-Project Exclusions__________________________________________________________
2.6 Sub-Project Interfaces___________________________________________________________
2.7 Date of start of Project___________________________________________________________
3. Assumptions__________________________________________________________
4. Initial Business Case___________________________________________________
5. Project Organisation Structure___________________________________________
6. Project Quality Plan____________________________________________________
7. Initial Project Plan_____________________________________________________
8. Project Controls_______________________________________________________
9. Project Constraints____________________________________________________
10. Exception Process____________________________________________________
11. Risk Log____________________________________________________________
12. Communication Strategy And Plan_______________________________________
Appendix 7.1 Detailed Project Plan__________________________________________
Appendix 7.2 Job Descriptions_____________________________________________
Team Leader. Mrs Hazel Anderson (Grade B3)___________________________________________
Main responsibilities____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
Curator. Grade B1/2 (to be appointed)_________________________________________________
Main responsibilities____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
Conservator. Mr Peter Dickson (Grade B2)______________________________________________
Main responsibilities____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
Conservators. 2 at Grade B1/2 (to be appointed)__________________________________________
Main responsibilities____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
Digitising supervisor. GSU__________________________________________________________
Main responsibilities____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
Quality controllers. 2, GSU__________________________________________________________
Main responsibilities____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
Digitisers. 8, GSU_________________________________________________________________
Main responsibilities____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
Appendix 7.3 Quality Assurance Plans_______________________________________
Appendix 7.4 Risk Logs__________________________________________________
APPENDIX 8 SPECIAL ARCHIVE SERVICES________________________________
1. Special Archive Services Sub-Project - Background__________________________
2. Sub-Project Definition__________________________________________________
2.1 Sub-Project Objectives__________________________________________________________
2.2 Defined Method of Approach_____________________________________________________
2.3 SAS Sub-Project Deliverables and Desired Outcome____________________________________
2.4 Sub-Project Scope______________________________________________________________
2.5 Sub-Project Exclusions__________________________________________________________
2.6 Sub-Project Interfaces___________________________________________________________
2.7 Date of start of Sub-Project_______________________________________________________
3. Assumptions__________________________________________________________
4. Initial Business Case___________________________________________________
5. Project Organisation Structure___________________________________________
6. Sub-Project Quality Plan________________________________________________
7. Initial Sub-Project Plan__________________________________________________
8. Sub-Project Controls___________________________________________________
9. Project Constraints____________________________________________________
10. Exception Process____________________________________________________
11. Risk Log____________________________________________________________
12. Communication Strategy And Plan_______________________________________
Appendix 8.1 Detailed Project Plan__________________________________________
Appendix 8.2 Special Archive Services Job Descriptions________________________
Team Leader Ms Joanna Baird Grade B3________________________________________________
Main responsibilities____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
Curatorial (1) Band B Range 1/2 (to be appointed)_________________________________________
Main responsibilities____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
Imaging Technician (2) Grade B1 (to be appointed)________________________________________
Main responsibilities____________________________________________________________
Specific responsibilities__________________________________________________________
Appendix 8.3 Quality Assurance Plans_______________________________________
Appendix 8.4 Risk Logs_________________________________________________
APPENDIX 9 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY______
1. Background_________________________________________________________
1.1. Introduction_________________________________________________________________
1.2. Related Documents____________________________________________________________
1.3. Related Internet Links__________________________________________________________
2. Sub-Project Definitions________________________________________________
2.1. Objectives__________________________________________________________________
2.1.1. Business Objectives_______________________________________________________
2.1.2. Functional Objectives______________________________________________________
2.1.3. Management Objectives____________________________________________________
2.2. Defined Methods of Approach___________________________________________________
2.3. Deliverables_________________________________________________________________
2.4. Project Scope________________________________________________________________
2.4.1. Definition_______________________________________________________________
2.4.2. In Scope________________________________________________________________
2.5. Exclusions__________________________________________________________________
2.6. Interfaces___________________________________________________________________
2.6.1. Main Interfaces__________________________________________________________
2.6.2. Integration and Project Consulting Services_____________________________________
2.7. Date of Start Of Project_________________________________________________________
2.7.1. Completion______________________________________________________________
3. Assumptions_________________________________________________________
4. Initial Business Case__________________________________________________
5. Project Organisation Structure__________________________________________
6. Project Quality Plan___________________________________________________
7. Initial Project Plan____________________________________________________
8. Project Controls______________________________________________________
9. Constraints__________________________________________________________
9.1. Strategic____________________________________________________________________
9.2. Operational__________________________________________________________________
10. Exception Process___________________________________________________
11. Risk Log___________________________________________________________
12. Communication Plan__________________________________________________
Appendix 9.1 Detailed Sub-Project Plan (Gantt Chart)__________________________
Appendix 9.2 Job Descriptions____________________________________________
IT Manager - B3_________________________________________________________________
IT Development - B2______________________________________________________________
IT Support - B1__________________________________________________________________
Appendix 9.3 Functional Requirements_____________________________________
Integration and Project Consulting Services____________________________________________
Network Components and Services___________________________________________________
Network Operating System and Office Applications______________________________________
Services Requiring Servers and Applications Software____________________________________
Services that must be hosted on NT_______________________________________________
Services that can be hosted on NT or UNIX__________________________________________
Office Workstations______________________________________________________________
Digitising Stations_______________________________________________________________
Internet Service Provider___________________________________________________________
ICT Training____________________________________________________________________
Uninterruptible Power Supply_______________________________________________________
Access to Scottish archives is hampered because users and potential users find it difficult or impossible to find out what information is available and which archives hold what information. There are further difficulties added, in that much of the information is available only in central Edinburgh and even when these difficulties are overcome old paper catalogues may be very difficult to use because of their complexity or size.
This project will alleviate these difficulties by creating an electronic search room for Scottish archives. This will hold electronic copies of the top level finding aids of every participating archive. All will be searchable electronically over the Internet. A knowledge data base of Scottish history will also be created which will be searchable electronically over the Internet. Initially 45 Scottish archives will participate in the Network. The largest participating archive is the National Archives of Scotland. A major primary source of Scottish history, the testaments from 1500 to 1875, will also be digitally imaged and linked to an electronic index.
The project is described in full in the proposal submitted to the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) in November 1996 and amended by further correspondence between the HLF and the Scottish Record Office until finally approved by the Trustees on 16 October 1998. (The Scottish Record Office became officially the National Archives of Scotland on 7 January 1999).
Funding for the project of £2.9 million has been agreed by the Trustees of the National Heritage memorial Fund. The required partnership funding is being provided by the National Archives of Scotland and the Genealogical Society of Utah (GSU).
· to create an electronic search room for the 45 participating Scottish archives.
· to collect the top level finding aids of the participating archives as they exist in the year 2,000; to convert them to the International Standard for Archival Description (ISAD(G)) and into electronic form; to provide electronic links to more detailed electronic catalogues, if they exist, or to state that more detailed catalogues exist only on paper; and to make this information available and searchable electronically over the Internet.
· to construct a knowledge data base of 1000 key themes of Scottish history from sources in participating archives and make it searchable electronically over the Internet.
· to develop a range of other services to enhance the electronic search room, including exhibitions, a bookshop, “coffee machine” (themed discussion groups), yellow pages and noticeboard for Scottish archives, all searchable electronically over the Internet.
· to develop the existing electronic catalogues of the National Archives of Scotland and make the top level finding aids of 1000 major fonds available over the Internet.
· to convert the various indexes to Scottish testaments, 1500-1875, to electronic form and link them electronically to digital images of the testaments.
· to improve the preservation conditions of the original testaments.
· to provide a report on the technical, financial and preservation implications of large-scale digitisation of archive material, in the light of the project experience.
The above are the objectives of the project. At the end of the project the Scottish Archive Network infrastructure and capability will be in place, this will allow further expansion and enhancement of the system but these further expansions are not part of this project.
The project will use Prince 2 project management methodology and Microsoft Project.
The implementation of the project will be split between four sub-projects comprising: top level finding aids; special archive services; testaments digitisation; and information technology and communications.
The three year project is split intellectually and practically into two separate parts:
a) the production of the products needed to create the infrastructure of the Scottish Archive Network and
b) the subsequent exploitation and expansion of these initial products.
Top level project plans are available at Appendix 2
Detailed sub-project plans are available at Appendices 6-9.
These comprise for each sub-project: sub-project initiation documents, detailed sub-project plans (Gantt Charts), job descriptions, quality assurance plans and risk logs.
These will be monitored by the Project Board ( see below 5.1 Project Board).
· the top level finding aids ( i.e. the fonds level finding aids) of all 45 participating archives, as they exist in the year 2,000, converted to ISAD(G) and into electronic form, electronic links provided to more detailed catalogues, if they exist in electronic form, or statements that more detailed catalogues exist only on paper, and this information made available and searchable electronically over the Internet without financial charge by the Scottish Archive Network.
· a knowledge data base of 1000 key themes in Scottish history, covering 450 subjects, 250 places, 250 people and 50 ‘how tos’ searchable electronically over the Internet; these will be made available without financial charge by the Scottish Archive Network.
· an electronic bookshop, coffee machine, yellow pages and noticeboard for Scottish archives made available and searchable electronically over the Internet without financial charge by the Scottish Archive Network.
· 20 archival exhibitions made available on the Internet without financial charge by the Scottish Archive Network.
· the existing electronic catalogues of the National Archives of Scotland at file/bundle/item level made available over the Internet without financial charge by the Scottish Archive Network.
· the 475,000 index entries to Scottish testaments, 1500-1875, converted to electronic form and linked to digital images of the testaments; the indexes made available over the Internet without financial charge by the Scottish Archive Network.
· the Scottish Archive Network site on the Internet will aim to be available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. In practice the target to be met will be 99% of that time.
· the original paper testaments placed in phase boxes and withdrawn from public consultation.
· a report published on the technical, financial and preservation implications of large-scale digitisation of archive material, in the light of the project experience.
The scope of the project is limited to the deliverables and outcomes listed above.
The definition of participant archive is an institution which provides public access to its holdings and which is professionally managed, normally by an archivist, on a full-time basis.
The project will not normally catalogue or re-catalogue documents.
It will only convert top level finding aids, it will not compile them.
Our intention is to create a transparent network accessible throughout the UK and to harmonise with future English and Welsh developments; nevertheless throughout the first three years of the project there will be no obligation for further harmonisation.
The Scottish Archive Network will co-operate with the National Archives of Scotland
· with the Historical Search Room in withdrawing the testaments from public use and providing surrogate copies
· with all record cataloguing branches in compiling the new NAS top level finding aid to replace the existing Summary Catalogue
· with Publications and Education Branch in providing facilities for electronic exhibitions and publications
· with Preservation Services Branch in all matters concerning the conservation and preservation of documents in the NAS.
It will use the agreed definitions, terminology
and standards of the International Council on Archives, and the name authority
standards of the National Council on Archives as far as is practicable. The
project will co-operate with the prototype European Union Archive Network.
The project will begin on the date when the contract is signed between the Trustees of the National Heritage Memorial Fund and Scottish Archive Network Ltd. Before this can be done contracts will have been signed between the National Archives of Scotland and the Scottish Archive Network Ltd and between the Genealogical Society of Utah and the Scottish Archive Network Ltd. At that time a specimen contract between the Scottish Archive Network Ltd and a participating archive will also be exhibited.
All these contracts are shown in Appendix 1.
The project assumes the continuing support of the Heritage Lottery Fund, the National Archives of Scotland and the Genealogical Society of Utah and at the levels given in the cost summary attached to the project submission. It assumes the HLF will agree contracts and make payments timeously and will answer requests for decisions within two weeks of receiving the request.
It assumes the support and active involvement of the 45 participating archives.
It assumes the active co-operation of NAS staff, with the project in general,
and in particular
· from Historical Search Room staff in withdrawing the testaments from public use and providing surrogate copies
· from all staff of record cataloguing branches in compiling the new NAS top level finding aid to replace the existing Summary Catalogue
· from Publications and Education Branch staff in providing access to material for electronic exhibitions and publications
· from existing conservation staff co-operating fully with their Scottish Archive Network conservation colleagues.
It assumes that
· NAS will continue to provide suitably qualified staff on secondment if this becomes necessary.
· staff, personnel and welfare matters will continue to be handled by the Scottish Office throughout the project.
· NAS will continue to provide day-to day accounting support to the project, that is purchase advice and assistance (10% of working time of Grade B3) and book keeping and preparation of company accounts to trial balance (10% of working time of Grade B1).
· reception, messengerial, security and cleaning services will be provided by NAS to the Scottish Archive Network free of charge.
· all public orders relating to copies of wills that have been digitised will be dealt with by Scottish Archive Network staff and revenue earned from these will be retained by the project.
· During the three years of the project it assumes that Scottish Archive Network Ltd will be responsible for all sales generated through digital imaging of documents in the holdings of the NAS and will retain the revenue earned, though NAS may receive a royalty payment for documents that are made available for digital imaging (other than wills).
The Project will use the project management methodology PRINCE 2 amended to suit the particular requirements of the Scottish Archive Network.
Detailed job descriptions of all the posts
described below are given in Appendices 6-9 and Appendix 4
The Board members are the decision makers responsible for the commitment of resources to the project. They will also ensure that the aims of the project continue to be aligned with evolving archival and information technology needs world-wide.
The Project Board is accountable for the success of the project. It will approve all major plans and authorise any major deviation from agreed project plans. It will ensure that required resources are committed and will arbitrate on any conflicts within the project and negotiate a solution to any problem between the project and external bodies.
Project Manager, Dr Ishbel Barnes (Grade C1).
Senior User,[1] Mr George MacKenzie (Grade C1) 35% of his time.
Senior Supplier, Mr Rob Mildren (Grade B3) 50% of his time.
The following will be sent copies of the agendas and minutes of the board and have the right to attend any of its meetings:
Mr Patrick Cadell, the Keeper of the Records of Scotland
Mr Dick Sargent, Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts
HLF monitors, Dr Michael Smethurst and Dr Seamus Ross
The chairmen of the User and Participating Archives Groups may request to attend a meeting of the board to raise a specific concern.
This group will be responsible for insuring that users’ needs are incorporated into the Scottish Archive Network. It will also work with the individual project teams as the projects are developed. The chairman of the group has the right to attend the Project Board if he/she feels that the User Group’s needs are not being incorporated in the Network. The Users will decide how often the Group is to meet.
The administration of their meetings will be undertaken by the Scottish Archive Network and their meetings will be attended by the Project Manager. Chairman Dr Alex Murdoch, Department of Scottish History, Edinburgh University.
This group will be responsible for insuring that the needs of participating archives are incorporated into the Scottish Archive Network. The chairman of the group has the right to attend the Project Board if he/she feels that the Participating Archive Group’s needs are not being incorporated in the Network. The members will decide how often the Group is to meet.
The administration of their meetings will be undertaken by the Scottish Archive Network and their meetings will be attended by the Project Manager. Chairman still to be appointed.
Grade B1. to be appointed. Provides administrative services and support to the project.
1. Top
Level Finding Aids
2. Special
Archive Services
3. Testaments
4. Information
and Communications Technology
The project is split into four parts. In order
to reflect the differing natures of these four parts, three will be treated as
formal sub-projects and one will report directly to the project manager. These
four sub-projects are all split intellectually and practically into two parts -
a) the
production of the products needed to create the infrastructure of the Scottish
Archive Network
b) the
subsequent exploitation and expansion of these products.
For example, sub-project 1. top level finding
aids, will
a) create
the template for the top level finding aids and then
b) convert
all the top level finding aids into the template.
Full details of each of these 4 sub-projects are
given in Appendices 6-9.
The Project Manager will delegate authority and responsibility for this product to this team of specialists.
Team Leader, Dr Alan Borthwick (Grade B3)
3 Grade B1s to be appointed.
This part of the project will be regarded as a formal sub-project with its own sub-project board. This sub-project board will comprise Dr Borthwick, sub-project manager, Dr Barnes and Mr Arnott Wilson, Archivist, Edinburgh University.
See Appendices 6 for details of this sub-project.
The Project manager will delegate authority and responsibility for this product to this team of specialists.
Team Leader, Ms Joanna Baird (Grade B3)
1 Grade B1 to be appointed
2 digital imagers to be appointed
This part of the project will not be regarded as
a formal sub-project. Ms Baird will report directly to the Project Manager.
See Appendix 8 for details of this sub-project.
The Project manager will delegate authority and responsibility for this product to this team of specialists.
Team Leader, Mrs Hazel Anderson (Grade B3)
1 Grade B1 to be appointed
1 Conservator Grade B2 Mr Peter Dickson
2 Conservators Grade B1 to be appointed
1 Digitising supervisor (GSU)
2 quality controllers (GSU volunteers)
8 digitisers (GSU volunteers)
This part of the project will be regarded as a
formal sub-project with its own sub-project board. This sub-project board will
comprise Mrs Anderson, sub-project manager, Dr Barnes and Dr John Shaw,
National Archives of Scotland.
See Appendix 7 for details of this sub-project.
The IT specialists working on the project will
report to Mr Mildren.
IT Development Grade B2 to be appointed
IT Support Grade B1 to be appointed
This part of the project will be regarded as a formal sub-project with its own sub-project board. This sub-project board will comprise Mr Mildren, sub-project manager, Dr Barnes and Mr David Brownlee, General Register Office (Scotland).
See Appendix 9 for details of this sub-project.
The purpose of this plan is to define how the Scottish Archive Network intends to deliver products which
a) meet the users’ quality expectations, recognising that these in many cases will be subjective, and
b) conform with recognised archival, IT and financial quality standards.
The project board will insure that the products meet the criteria listed in the quality controls in the four individual sub PIDS. (See Appendices 6-9).
The individual sub PIDS list the differing quality controls for the two separate stages of each project, i.e.
a) the production of the products needed to create the infrastructure of the Scottish Archive Network and
b) the subsequent exploitation and expansion of these initial products. See Appendices 6-9.
Overall quality control for the project lies with the project board and within the board is the special responsibility of Mr MacKenzie. Quality control over the IT elements of the project is the special responsibility of Mr Brownlee.
The HLF monitors will also act as quality controllers at their monitoring meetings.
The archival standards to be met are the International Standard for Archival Description (ISAD(G)), the rules for the (UK) National Name Authority File and the definitions of the International Council of Archives Dictionary of Archival Terminology.
The financial standards and controls of the project are as follows:
the financial management of the project will be monitored by the HLF;
it will also be subject to audit by Scottish Office audit unit and the National Audit Office, as well as by the auditors appointed by Scottish Archive Network Ltd, The McCabe Partnership, Chartered Accountants, 56 Palmerston Place, Edinburgh EH12 5AY.
The project management standards are those of PRINCE 2.
The Heritage Lottery Fund will receive a monthly report, the agreed headings of that report are given in Appendix 5. They will agree the Project Initiation Document and receive copies of the Project Board minutes. Meetings will be held with the Heritage Lottery Fund every three months.
Project Board meetings will be held at least every month.
Sub-project meetings will be held weekly. They will produce highlight reports every two weeks.
It will be the responsibility of Project Support to collect the information from sub-project leaders to update their detailed sub-project plans and to feed this into the top level plan of the Project Board. Microsoft Project will be used for this purpose.
The requirement to advertise staff vacancies for SCAN within the Scottish Office and National Archives of Scotland is a constraint, because it may reduce the pool of suitably qualified staff, particularly from the participating archives. On the other hand, it will speed up the recruitment process. In the case of curatorial staff at sub-project level, the restraint will not operate, as this is considered an entry grade and recruitment will be open.
The requirement of HLF that any NAS staff seconded to work on SCAN must be backfilled immediately, represents a constraint that will slow down recruitment. It can be overcome by using casual staff to fill NAS vacancies until a replacement postholder can be recruited.
If the three monthly project plans are not fulfilled the Project Manager will report this to the Project Board along with proposals for returning the project to the agreed plans.
A weekly newsletter will be issued to:
all members of the project board; all participating archives; all staff of the Scottish Archive Network project; all staff of the National Archives of Scotland; all directors of the Scottish Archive Network Company, the chairman of the Users Group.
Regular meetings will be arranged with the Participating Archives Group and with the Users Group. Reports from these two groups will be submitted to the Project Board The chairman of the Users Group will have the right to attend the Project Board.
Meetings will be held with the HLF project monitors, Dr Smethurst and Dr Ross every 3 months.
Scottish archives are not merely the dusty
papers so often portrayed by journalists.
They are central to the culture and history of our country, they are the
written guarantee of our democracy.
When Edward I in 1291 and Oliver Cromwell in
1651 removed the records of Scotland from their proper home, they deprived
Scotland of something essential to its character and personality. When the
framers of the Act of Union declared in Article 24 that the records of Scotland
shall "continue to be keeped as they are within that part of the United
Kingdom now called Scotland, and that they shall so remain in all time
coming", they recognised both their distinctive character and their
symbolic significance.
Scotland has been lucky in the last 250 years to
live through times of internal peace.
Some of our continental neighbours have been less fortunate; and for
them their records are the symbol of their freedom, the token of their
democratic rights, and of their national individuality. In 20th century
Scotland we have perhaps had less cause, but we certainly have no less reason,
to look upon our records in the same way. It is right then that we should both
preserve these records to the highest professional standards and also that we
should make them known to the people of Scotland in whose name they are
preserved.
For various historical reasons archives in
Scotland are far more centralised than in England; it is therefore simplest
when describing the current archival situation in Scotland to split Scottish
archives into two parts, archives outside the NAS, and archives within the NAS.
Archives outside the NAS comprise
· Local authority archives, there are
currently 24 local authority archives including the archives of the four major
cities, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen and Dundee
· University archives, Aberdeen, Dundee,
Edinburgh, Glasgow, Heriot-Watt, Strathclyde and St Andrews
· Health board archives
· The manuscript department of the National Library
of Scotland
· Private archives, either of commercial
undertakings such as banks or of private families and individuals.
There is at present no simple way of finding out
which archive holds what papers, there is no simple way of finding out to what
level or degree of detail the papers have been catalogued and there is no
simple way of finding out which papers no longer exist.
The holdings of the NAS
·
Records of the central government
institutions of the pre-Union Kingdom of Scotland, parliament, privy council
and the great offices of state such as chancery and exchequer;
·
Some of the records of the post Union
government of Scotland including
¨
Records of all the Scottish Office
departments as well as UK departments which have a separate body of Scottish
records;
¨
Records of the Scottish divisions of
nationalised industries and their earlier predecessors - rail, coal, gas, steel
etc.;
·
Records of the central courts, both
criminal and civil, the High Court and the Court of Session;
·
Records of local courts, the sheriff
courts, commissary courts etc.;
·
The two great registers of private rights
and property in Scotland, the Register of
Deeds and the Register of Sasines;
·
Local authority records, the community
charge and valuation rolls;
·
Records of the Church of Scotland and the
Free Churches;
·
Special collections, very large
collections of shipbuilding records, of maps and plans and of seals;
·
Over 500 collections of private papers,
these include large collections of papers of both families and businesses.
The National Register of Archives
(Scotland) has attempted to answer part
of this problem by providing lists of papers in private hands but has always
restricted itself only to private papers. The National Register of Archives
(Scotland) is a part of the NAS.
The catalogues of these papers are available in
the NAS, but again without visiting the search rooms in central Edinburgh it is
difficult to find out what the NAS holds and it is again difficult to find out
the very different levels of detail which have been used to catalogue the very
varying collections.
Summary
There is no one central point where a researcher
can find out
·
where the archives are in Scotland
·
what these archives hold
·
what catalogues they hold
·
how detailed these catalogues are
Attempts
have been made by various archives in Scotland to harness the new technologies
in order to make their holdings more widely known, but at present the effort is
patchy and piecemeal. Automation may in fact make the situation more confused
in that an archive which has automated, by that very fact, makes its holdings
more widely known than an archive with holdings of as great, or greater,
importance which has not automated.
A
survey of readers carried out in 1993 highlighted a demand for increasing these
opening hours. The research was carried out by the Scottish Office Central
Research Unit. Users were asked to indicate, from a range of specified
alternatives, three additional services or facilities they would like to see in
the NAS (for simplicity no elaboration on the nature of these preferences was
allowed in the questionnaire).
Services
or Facilities Requested By The Users
Number of Endorsements (rank)
Service or
Facility |
Historical
Search Room |
West Search Room |
Opening one or more weekday evening |
145 (2) |
101 (2) |
Longer daytime opening hours |
129 (3) |
71 (4) |
Opening Saturday mornings |
117 (4) |
74 (3) |
The
report concluded that
Longer
opening hours were also strongly favoured by users, particularly opening on one
or more weekday evenings. Presumably this reflects the wish, amongst the
long-stay users, and perhaps those who have travelled some distance to visit
the NAS, to avoid breaking off work and having to return to complete the job on
another day. Also, it would permit users to visit the NAS at a time which
doesn’t conflict with their daytime routines. The existing opening hours must
severely constrain those users, and potential users, who have daytime
obligations (e.g. those in employment or looking after children). It is likely
that an increase in opening hours would not only be more convenient for
existing users but would also encourage greater use of the NAS by potential
users.
A preliminary detailed survey of a
representative sample of the Commissary Court volumes comprising approximately
40 volumes was carried out by a senior member of NAS conservation staff and a
brief visual examination of the location, environment, handling and current
levels of usage investigated and assessed in conjunction with appropriate
curatorial staff. At present these volumes are heavily used by researchers,
frequently copied despite the existence of microfilm and continued recourse to
the original material is necessary largely due to the poor quality of the
microfilm.
As
part of the research for this proposal we have looked at a number of the
Internet sites currently available for archives on the World Wide Web. Their
archivists all report that usage normally exceeds expectations.
One
of the best examples of an archive Internet site, complete with an Electronic
Search Room, is the British Columbia Archives in Canada. They have an average
of 3,000 hits per day. The amount of Scottish material which will be available
through SCAN, together with the interest in Scottish history and genealogy
throughout the world, makes us certain that we will exceed this figure very
considerably.
SCAN
is not aimed at any one particular group of users. It will be of use to anyone
interested in Scotland, its culture and its history.
SCAN
will have, we believe, an impact on many parts of the Scottish educational
system. It will be of use to many types of academic researchers, not just to
academic historians. However academic historians have already shown great
interest in the proposal and indeed one Scottish University History Department
has already offered to participate in any future developments. It will also be
of great interest to schools and ties in very well with the current trends to
increase the awareness and teaching of Scottish history in Scottish schools.
Schools are already increasingly using the Internet for various educational
purposes, Scottish children will be able to use SCAN to learn about their
own history and about the sources for
that history.
SCAN
will be used by genealogists and by local historians and indeed by every type
of historian whether amateur or professional.
One of the most important points of SCAN
is that it will provide a starting point for people interested in Scottish
Archives. There are no prescriptive standards for the institutions taking part
as to how they organise themselves outwith SCAN. Each institution’s own
electronic search rooms are purely their own concern and it will only be
experience and public comment that will be likely to shape them into something
more coherent and consistent, but that is not the concern of this project
application. The more immediate and achievable issue we are addressing is
providing a common point of access through a single point to the whole area of
Scottish Archives.
Through SCAN this will be possible. All
contributing archives will submit information, formatted to a common standard,
at a consistent hierarchical level of description. This will give users of SCAN
a more accurate and consistent picture where in Scotland they will be likely to
find source material.
Importantly, the approach is looking for
Scottish archive sources and not simply institutions. Through time we would
expect the Frequently Asked Questions to address this by referring to relevant
source material wherever in the world it may be, and if there are electronic
links to those institutions then these too will be embedded in the answers. The
Top Level Finding Aids would include those from institutions such as NARA,
Canadian Archives, Vatican archives and so on where they refer to significant
Scottish material.
The
service outlined above does not need to be staffed 24 hours a day in order to
be available for, at least, reference use. The staff involved directly with the
project would be working the current normal opening hours of NAS which is open
from Monday to Friday 7.45 to 18.15. The search rooms themselves are currently
open to the public from 9.00 until 16.30 Monday to Thursday and 9.00 to 16.00
on Friday.
Through
the availability of SCAN and an NAS electronic search room, this demand can, at
least in part, be met. The service would
be expected to operate with an availability of 99%. To all intents and purposes
this would mean that the facility would be available around the clock and
throughout the year. There will, inevitably, be occasions when there will be
interruptions for routine maintenance, upgrades and the like but these will be
scheduled, wherever possible, during the quietest periods of use of SCAN.
In
addition, those users of NAS who are able to visit can make better use of their
time when visiting the buildings. Information regarding range of holdings,
opening hours, ordering information, as well as correspondence with staff and
researching the catalogues themselves can all be consulted well in advance of
an actual visit. The possibility of ordering and receiving copies of documents
in advance would also help people make even greater use of the times that the
buildings themselves are already open.
We
would anticipate that a significant proportion of the use of SCAN will be from
outwith Scotland. There are large numbers of people of Scots descent in Canada,
USA, Australia and New Zealand. Because of the time differences, even telephone
contact with the NAS can be inconvenient for them currently. The availability
of the search tools and frequently asked questions will be an invaluable tool
for readers throughout the world to help themselves without NAS having to prove
additional staff resources. The use of the Chat Forum would also be a useful
additional facility for people anywhere in the world to post and discuss issues
relating to Scottish Archives, again without a requirement on NAS to provide
staff resource to manage and answer the queries raised.
Electronic
mail access to staff in NAS would provide another widely available means of
contact between staff and users of the service. This too would remove some of
the time constraints imposed by the opening hours.
SCAN
will offer all participating archives a means of publicising themselves but also
a means of allowing readers throughout the world to make contact with them.
Part
of SCAN will be to publicise the traditional means of contacting (visiting
hours, telephone numbers, addresses etc.), but in addition SCAN will provide
e-mail contacts. Small archives not currently on Internet will have an Internet
account, including e-mail, made available for them. Larger institutions will be
able to publicise their existing e-mail addresses.
SCAN
will also cater for archive interest groups which are not based in a single
institution and allow them to publicise their own information and means of
contacting them.
The
Coffee Machine too will provide a means of contact with all aspects of Scottish
Archives and, indeed, will create a new forum for people to discuss with each
other areas of mutual archive interest.
Statistics
from the Keepers Annual report indicate that 3,443 (2,710 in Historical Search
room and 733 in West Search Room) postal enquiries were dealt with in the year
1993-1994. It could reasonably be expected that opening up an alternatives
means of communicating with the NAS would increase this figure dramatically.
There
are no recorded figures available for the number of telephone enquiries dealt
with by the search room staff but indications are that these currently exceed
the number of postal enquiries. In addition, the fact that SCAN will be
available throughout the world and for longer periods of time than telephone
access would also mean that the number of enquiries received through SCAN would
be significantly increased.
The
implication of this is that greatly increased numbers of curatorial staff would
be required in order to deal with the correspondence generated through SCAN.
However,
there are a number of reasons for believing that, with the same or reduced
number of curatorial staff working in this area, NAS could cope with these
demands.
· A large number of the letters and telephone enquiries are routine or along broadly similar lines. Many relate to which source documents are held in which organisation, how to go about researching genealogy using the material available in the NAS, common topics and so on. Dealing with such enquiries is precisely the point of SCAN and in particular the use of a Frequently Asked Questions list and such enquiries coming directly to NAS staff would be pointed towards the Frequently Asked Questions as their initial course of action. It is anticipated that this source of information will deal with a significant proportion of all enquiries.
· One of the most time consuming elements for staff in the Historical Search Room is repeatedly explaining the complexities of researching the wills and also in assisting new readers in this task One estimate suggests that 70% of staff time in the Historical Search room can be spent dealing with such enquiries. The production of a single computer index to the wills and the availability of the images of the wills would simplify this procedure. It could subsequently be the responsibility of a non-specialist non-curatorial grade staff to deal with this area. In addition, curatorial staff involved in this function would be free to do other tasks.
· The provision of the chat facility referred to elsewhere in this document is also intended to help users help themselves. It cannot be anticipated precisely how this will evolve but it is the intention that the chat forum helps all institutions involved in SCAN with addressing the increased demand that will follow.
Our
conclusion therefore is that it is precisely the provision of SCAN and the
facilities it will offer and an electronic search room for the NAS that will
allow us to deal with a greatly increased number of ‘enquiries’ of all sorts,
and it can be seen in our plans for the running costs of SCAN beyond the
lifetime of the project that it is direct savings in this area that will help
fund the future operation of SCAN.
We do not, at present, believe that digitisation
of images does away with the preservation requirements of the original
documents. However there can be no doubt that increased usage of a document
means increased wear on the document and the resulting conservation and
preservation problems.
NAS policy will be to provide the digital image
within the NAS as a surrogate for the original. As stated in the conservation
report, the pages will probably have to be disbound from their current (often
quite worn) bindings and can subsequently be stored in conservationally sound
boxes in a storeroom with strict temperature and humidity control. Access to
the originals after the digitisation process will seldom be needed or allowed.
As orders for wills and testaments make up more
than 20% of orders in the Historical Search Room, currently, clearly any means
of dealing with this demand need to be addressed.
It is anticipated that the availability of a
computerised index to the wills could produce a significant increase in orders.
1. Readers
would need much less time searching the indexes, producing cross reference and
so on to determine the correct volume to order. A large number of the orders
would be for index entries where the details may match in part but not in whole
and the reader will want to order the document ‘just in case’ it is relevant.
Currently, this is less likely to happen as there is so much effort in tracing
‘probable’ entries that the ‘possible’ entries are often omitted.
2. The
nature of the index will also make it so much easier to trace wills of
relevance to social, local or economic history that there will be a far greater
use of the wills for this sort of research and far more entries which may meet
a reader’s search criteria.
3. In
making the index available outwith NAS, access will be open to hundreds of
thousands of people with an interest in Scottish archives rather than the
thousands who are able to travel to the city centre in Edinburgh. This too
could be expected to double or treble the number of requests for printouts or
copies.
Evidently such a manifold increase in the usage,
orders and copying of wills and testaments would present a significant problem
in terms both of preservation and access for the wills and testaments series.
In such a context therefore it is absolutely essential to look at other means
of allowing access to the wills and the digitisation solution addresses these
issues.
In every archive the security of the document is
of paramount importance. Documents, unlike printed books, are normally
literally unique and cannot therefore be replaced if lost or stolen.
Various differing aspects of document security
are addressed by these proposals. The
NAS, along with many other archives, has a programme of security microfilming,
that is a programme to provide microfilms as secure surrogates for the records.
The proposals to digitise the images of the
wills addresses the security issues more satisfactorily
· The image can, quite easily, be made available outwith the NAS
· Images from the same volume can be accessed by more than one person at the same time
· The production process is greatly simplified and misplacement of the originals can be eliminated
· The colour content of the original can be reproduced with a fair degree of accuracy
· Quality copies can be produced from the digital image, time after time without degrading the quality of the original
· The original volumes can be stored securely and remote from the point of production
· A quality image will provide a surrogate for the original. The NAS policy on access to the original will be that access will only be allowed where the research directly concerns the physical nature of the original material
· A quality image will provide secure evidence of original ownership
The service will be available for users for 24
hours a day 7 days a week for 99% of the time
20,000 copies of the testaments will be ordered
annually. 150,000 testamentary images will be viewed in the buildings of the
NAS. 150,000 searches of the index will be made.
Number of visitors to SCAN will be a factor of
20 higher than the number of visitors to the buildings of the NAS.
SCAN will act as a prototype and a service to
other archives considering making information available on the Internet.
The use of top level material through SCAN will
raise the profile of the archives involved and encourage them to contribute
more information at a more detailed level.
Access to the Commissary material will, in all
but the most exceptional cases, be through the digital surrogate.
The project will completed over approximately a
three year timespan. The overall cost of the project is estimated at £3.9
million with 2.9 million in funding from the Heritage Lottery Fund, £.7 million
in staff resources contributed by the Genealogical Society of Utah and £.3
million from the National Archives of Scotland in the form of staff, building
alteration and a grant.
·
SCAN Costs 2-7 is provided as Appendix
3.1
·
For a detailed description of each
expenditure item see Appendix 3.2 - Descriptions and Explanation
Ref |
Description |
Cross
Reference |
1 |
Summary
of Costs |
|
1.1 |
Preparation Summary of bid preparation costs including bid
preparation, preparation of accommodation and digitising cameras |
7.1 to 7.9 |
1.2 |
All Staff Costs All staff costs for the project, now including
GSU staff. Summary figure includes VAT
where applicable |
2.1 to 2.12 and 7.12 to 7.14 |
1.3 |
Internet Server and Storage As in original submission |
3.1 to 3.11 |
1.4 |
Communications As in original submission. Figures based on usage estimates (see notes
on anticipated usage elsewhere) |
4.1 to 4.8 |
1.5 |
Digitisation of Testaments As requested, this now comprises only
equipment costs and maintenance. Staff
costs previously included here have been transferred to 1.2 above. |
5.1 to 5.8 |
1.6 |
Other Costs As requested,
costs of fund raising have been removed as these are disallowed and
PCs now include cost of maintenance for 3 years of project. |
6.1 to 6.20 |
1.7 |
Contingency This is set at 5% of total project costs |
|
1.8 |
Totals This figure gives the total of 1.1 to 1.7
above |
|
1.9 |
Partnership Funding This is made up of bid preparation, SRO/NAS
contribution and GSU contribution. For
further details, see SCAN costs 7 |
7.1 to 7.14 |
1.9.1 |
NAS Contribution This is derived from 1.9, specifically highlighting the
contribution by SRO/NAS in cash, to comply with HLF rules |
|
1.10 |
Lottery Funding Required This is the difference between project total
costs in 1.8, and partnership funding in 1.9 |
|
Ref |
Description |
Cross
Reference |
2 |
All
Staff Costs |
|
2.1 |
Project Manager Dr Ishbel Barnes will take up her duties as
Project Manager immediately there is a favourable decision by the HLF
Trustees, and her post as head of Private Records Branch will be backfilled
immediately thereafter at C1 level (formerly Curatorial C). |
7.10 |
2.2 |
Team Leaders The grades are now known as B3 (formerly
Curatorial D). These staff will be on
secondment from SRO/NAS and the terms and conditions will be as described in
document to be attached |
|
2.3 |
IT Developer This grade is now known as B2 (formerly HEO
IT). This person will be on secondment
from SRO/NAS and the terms and conditions will be as described in document to
be attached |
|
2.4 |
IT Support This grade is now known as B1 (formerly EO
IT). This person will be on secondment
from SRO/NAS and the terms and conditions will be as described in document to
be attached |
|
2.5 |
Curatorial TLFAs This grade is now known as B2 (formerly
Curatorial E). These staff will be on secondment from
SRO/NAS and the terms and conditions will be as described in document to be
attached |
|
2.6 |
Wills E This grade is now known as B2 (formerly
Curatorial E). This person will be on
secondment from SRO/NAS and the terms and conditions will be as described in
document to be attached |
|
2.7 |
FAQ E This grade is now known as B2 (formerly
Curatorial E). This person will be on
secondment from SRO/NAS and the terms and conditions will be as described in
document to be attached |
|
2.8 |
Conservation F This grade is now known as B1 (formerly
Conservation F). These staff will be on secondment from SRO/NAS and the terms
and conditions will be as described in document to be attached |
|
2.9 |
Reprographic Staff These staff will be graded as B1 (formerly
Conservation F). They staff will be on
secondment from SRO/NAS and the terms and conditions will be as described in
document to be attached |
|
2.10 |
Digitisation Supervisor This post is graded at B2. This person will be provided by GSU. |
7.12 |
2.11 |
Digitisation Staff These posts are graded at B1. These staff will
be provided by GSU |
7.13 |
2.12 |
Project Administrator This post is graded at B1 (formerly EO) This person will be on secondment from
SRO/NAS. For outline job description,
see separate document |
|
Ref
|
Description |
Cross
Reference |
3 |
Internet
Server and Storage |
|
3.1 |
Web Server As in original submission. This is the main unit communicating
information across the World Wide Web (Internet). Modular range based on UltraSPARC processor |
|
3.2 |
SPARC storage array As in original submission. This is a series of on line hard disks |
|
3.3 |
HSM (hierarchical Storage Management) As in original submission. This is software that controls retrieval,
back up and recovery of data and applications on the network. |
|
3.4 |
HP Sure Store As in original submission. These are the units that hold the optical
disks containing the data. |
|
3.5 |
Optical Media As in original submission. These are the data media for the storage
devices in 3.4 |
|
3.6 |
Server Software As in original submission. This is the software that provides access
to the Internet |
|
3.7 |
Browser Software As in original submission. This software will allow participating
archives to search and retrieve information from the World Wide Web. |
|
3.8 |
SUN Enterprise 1 As in original submission. This is the computer protecting the network
data from outside interference |
|
3.9 |
Solstice Firewall 1 As in original submission. This is the software for the computer in
3.8 |
|
3.10 |
UPS (Uninteruptible Power Supply) As in original submission. This device protects the network equipment
against power surges or cuts. |
|
3.11 |
Maintenance As in original submission. This is assumed at 10% of the capital costs
for the above equipment, and applies in years 2 and 3. |
|
Ref
|
Description |
Cross
Reference |
4 |
Communications |
|
4.1 |
Internet Router As in original submission. This device manages communications between
the Internet and the SCAN web server. |
|
4.2 |
Dial Up Access As in original submission. This allows participating archives to
access the Internet through the SCAN network. |
|
4.3 |
Simple Configuration As in original submission. This applies to setting up the equipment in
4.1 and 4.2 for secure access |
|
4.4 |
Leased Line Installation As in original submission. This is the line between the network
equipment and the Internet Service Provider |
|
4.5 |
Rental of Internet Bandwidth As in original submission. This is the user charge for the line
referred to in 4.4. the bandwith will
be sufficient for the anticipated usage |
|
|
|
|
Ref
|
Description |
Cross
Reference |
5 |
Digitisation
of Testaments |
|
5.1 |
Modification to Ventilation and Electricals This is work to provide suitable conditions in
which to scan original archival documents |
7.6 |
5.2 |
Professional Design Fees for Above These cover mechanical and electrical
engineering, space planning and workstation ergonomics |
7.7 |
5.3 |
Provision of Workstations and Screens These are specialist pieces of equipment for
housing digitising equipment and lighting |
7.8 |
5.4 |
Data Capture for Finding Aids As in original submission. This is electronic capture of indexes to
the wills |
|
5.5 |
Digital Cameras Standard This will be the most commonly used model of
camera, for the majority of sizes and conditions of volumes of wills |
|
5.6 |
Digital Cameras Large Format This will be used for outsize volumes and
others requiring special attention, handling etc. |
|
5.7 |
Maintenance of Digitising Equipment Essential maintenance of critical pieces of
equipment |
|
5.8 |
PCs and Associated Equipment These are high-specification PCs, optimised
for handling digital images |
|
|
|
|
Ref
|
Description |
Cross
Reference |
6 |
Other
Costs |
|
6.1 |
PCs for SCAN Staff As in original submission. This covers the provision of PC, software
and peripheral devices for 12 SCAN staff, but not for GSU digitising staff,
whose equipment is described at 5.8 |
|
6.2 |
Workstations for Wills As in original submission. These are high-specification PCs, optimised
for handling digital images, to be used for public access in the search rooms
of the SRO/NAS |
|
6.3 |
Large Screens for Wills These are computer screens for the public
access machines in 6.2 above |
|
6.4 |
Additional Network Equipment As in original submission. These are to allow SCAN staff access to
SRO/NAS networks and facilities |
|
6.5 |
Furniture for SCAN staff As in original submission. This covers additional equipment where
appropriate |
|
6.6 |
Consultancy Budget As in original submission. This covers the provision of
specialist advice and assistance in
the areas of digitising, computer performance, security and communications |
|
6.7 |
Web Design for SCAN As in original submission. This covers the purchase of outside
expertise for high quality design of the SCAN public interface |
|
6.8 |
Staff and Archivists Training As in original submission. This covers training courses for staff of
SCAN and participating archives in professional and technical aspects of the
project |
|
6.9 |
Travel As in original submission. This covers the costs of SCAN staff
visiting participating archives. |
|
6.10 |
Software As in original submission. This covers the provision of software for
handling images and associated index information |
|
6.11 |
PCs for Archives As in original submission. This covers the provision of PCs, software, peripherals, Internet access and training where
necessary. For detailed breakdown, see
paper tabled at meeting on 3 September. |
|
6.12 |
Printer for Quality Colour Output As in original submission. This is a high specification printer,
capable of producing very high quality images from the wills. |
|
6.13 |
Other Digitisation Equipment As in original submission. This equipment will carry out ad hoc
digitisation (not the wills) in connection with the special archive services to be provided by
the SCAN network |
|
6.14 |
Conservation Material As in original submission. This covers consumables to be used for
conservation and storage of original documents that are to be digitised. |
|
6.15 |
Postage and Packing As in original submission. This covers incidental postage expenses for
the project |
|
6.16 |
Legal Fees This covers fees for advising on contractual
obligations of SCAN with SRO/NAS, HLF,
participating archives and suppliers |
|
6.17 |
Accountancy Fees This covers fees for advising on the tax and
business planning aspects of the project (any reductions in VAT liability
will reduce the net costs of the project) |
|
6.18 |
Marketing and Development This covers consultancy in connection with the
promotion of the project, and dissemination of its products. The fund-raising element in the original
submission has now been excluded |
|
6.19 |
Data Capture for Finding Aids This covers electronic capture of information
in finding aids including those in other participating archives. It does not cover indexes to wills (which
are covered in 5.4 above) |
|
6.20 |
Insurance This covers essential equipment belonging to
the project only. It does not cover
any buildings or other items covered by government indemnity |
|
6.21 |
Office Equipment This covers the provision of fax, photocopy
and other essential equipment for the project |
|
|
|
|
Ref
|
Description |
Cross
Reference |
7 |
Partnership
Funding |
|
7.1 |
Tods Murray This covers legal fees incurred in setting up
the company to run the project.
Invoice supplied for part of work completed to date; further work
expected as part of Bid Preparation to be paid by SRO/NAS |
|
7.2 |
Lorien As discussed on 3 September 1998, the fund
raising element in the original submission has now been excluded |
|
7.3 |
McCabe Partnership This covers fees for initial tax and business
planning advice in connection with the project. Invoice supplied for part of
work completed to date; further work expected as part of Bid Preparation to
be paid by SRO/NAS |
|
7.4 |
Paul Griew This consultant provided advice on the IT and
management aspects of the project |
|
7.5 |
Travel This coves two study visits by Rob Mildren to:
1. the British Columbia Archives and
the National Archives of Canada, to study electronic search rooms and digital
imaging; and 2. to Salt Lake City, Utah, to discuss technical aspects of
their participation in a large scale digitisation project. Both were at normal civil service rates |
|
7.6 |
Modification to Ventilation and Electricals This is work to provide suitable conditions
for scanning original archival documents |
5.1 |
7.7 |
Professional Design Fees These cover mechanical and electrical
engineering, space planning and workstation ergonomics |
5.2 |
7.8 |
Provision of Workstations These are specialist pieces of equipment for
housing digitising equipment and lighting |
5.3 |
7.9 |
Digitising Camera This is the Kontron ProgRes 3012 digital
camera, complete with high level PC and colour printer, supplied by Imaging
Associates |
|
7.10 |
Project Manager Dr Ishbel Barnes will take up her duties as
Project Manager immediately there is a favourable decision by the HLF
Trustees, and her post as head of Private Records Branch will be backfilled
immediately thereafter at C1 level (formerly Curatorial grade C). |
2.1 |
7.11 |
SRO/NAS Grant The Keeper of the Records of Scotland has
agreed to make a cash transfer to the project in order to provide the balance
of the partnership funding required under HLF rules |
|
7.12 |
GSU Supervisor This post is graded at B2 (formerly
Conservation E). Appointment of this
individual will be by agreement between SCAN and GSU |
2.10 |
7.13 |
GSU Staff These posts are graded at B1 (formerly
Conservation F). |
2.11 |
7.14 |
Digitising Camera and Set-up This covers a digital camera to be supplied by
the GSU. It has a lower value than the
camera in 7.9, as it does not include a PC or planetary camera stand. |
|
To ensure that the Scottish Archive Network produces the deliverables and outcomes listed at 2.3 to the required standard of quality and within 3 years at a cost of £4,000,000.
· to manage the production of these products:
· to direct and motivate the project teams;
· to plan and monitor the project;
· to manage business and project risks;
· to report to the Project Board;
· to liaise with the Genealogical Society of Utah, the participating archives, the Users Group and the National Archives of Scotland;
· to take responsibility for overall progress and use of resources and for project administration.
To provide the IT element of the Scottish Archive Network to the required standard of quality, within budget and within 3 years.
· SCAN IS Strategy
· ICT Infrastructure - specification, procurement, performance and maintenance
· IT Security Issues - develop policy for security of access to SCAN IT facilities and the integrity and preservation of data
· IT development and support work for SCAN
· IT staffing issues and line manager for SCAN IT staff
· Keeping all the above integrated with requirements of the NAS
Liaison between National Archives of Scotland
and the Scottish Archive Network
·
quality control for the 4 sub-projects
·
co-ordination of communication between
National Archives of Scotland, Scottish Archive Network, Heritage Lottery Fund
and participating archives
to support managers in all aspects of project administration
to organise the administration and to take the minutes of all the various SCAN group meetings i.e. the project Board, the Users Group, the Participating Archives Group, the and the Company Directors Meeting
· to operate the filing system
· to maintain day-to-day communications with the participating archives
All other job descriptions are given in the 4 individual sub-PIDs in Appendices 6-9
1.
Issues
2.
Progress
3.
Throughput
4.
Costs
5.
Staff
6.
Procurement
7.
Participating Archives
8.
Statistics on Use
9.
Users
10.
Project Board
Top Level Finding Aids
Sub-Project Initiation Document:
Alan Borthwick
Team Leader, Top Level Finding Aids
Scottish Archive Network
June 1999
Access to Scottish archives is hampered because
users and potential users find it difficult or impossible to find out what
information is available and which archives hold what information. Furthermore,
much of the information is available only in central Edinburgh; and even when
these difficulties are overcome old paper catalogues may be very difficult to
use because of their complexity or size.
There is no central point of reference in Scotland for detailed
information about the holdings of Scottish archives. This often means that archive users may spend
a considerable amount of time being passed from archive to archive and archive
staff waste valuable time answering similar questions over and over again.
This sub-project will alleviate these difficulties by assisting in the creation of an electronic search room for Scottish archives. This will hold electronic copies of the top level finding aids of every participating archive, with links to more detailed catalogues also in electronic form maintained by the participating archives (where they exist). All will be searchable electronically over the Internet. Initially 45 Scottish archives will participate in the Network, the largest participating archive being the National Archives of Scotland.
· to collect the top level finding aids of the participating archives as they exist in the year 2000
· to convert them to the International Standard for Archival Description (ISAD(G)) and into electronic form
· to provide electronic links to more detailed electronic catalogues, if they exist, or to state that more detailed catalogues exist only on paper
· to make this information available and searchable electronically over the Internet.
· to develop the existing electronic catalogues of the National Archives of Scotland and make the top level finding aids of 1000 major fonds available over the Internet.
The implementation of the Top Level Finding Aids sub-project will be carried out by the sub-project team. This sub-project will use Prince 2 project management methodology and Microsoft Project.
The detailed sub-project plan for Top Level Finding Aids is available at Appendix 6.1. This will be monitored by the main Project Board (see below Project Organisation Structure), and in the first instance will the particular responsibility of the sub-project board.
· the top level finding aids (i.e. the fonds level finding aids) of all 45 participating archives, as they exist in the year 2000, converted to ISAD(G) and into electronic form, with electronic links provided to more detailed catalogues, if they exist in electronic form, or statements that more detailed catalogues exist only on paper, and this information made available and searchable electronically over the Internet without financial charge by the Scottish Archive Network.
· the existing electronic catalogues of the National Archives of Scotland at file/bundle/item level made available over the Internet without financial charge by the Scottish Archive Network.
· the Scottish Archive Network site on the Internet will aim to be available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. In practice the target to be met will be 98% of that time.
The scope of the sub-project is limited to the deliverables and outcomes listed above.
The definition of participating archive is an institution which provides public access to its holdings and which is professionally managed, normally by an archivist, on a full-time basis.
The sub-project will not normally catalogue or re-catalogue documents. It will only convert top level finding aids, it will not provide them.
This is part of the main project intention to create a transparent network accessible throughout the UK and to harmonise with future English and Welsh developments; nevertheless throughout the first three years of the project there will be no obligation for further harmonisation.
The sub-project will co-operate with
· all record cataloguing branches of the National Archives of Scotland in compiling the new NAS top level finding aid to replace the existing Summary Catalogue
· all other participating archives in compilation of their top level finding aids
At all times the TLFA work will be carried out with a minimum of disruption to normal work patterns of the host institution whose TLFA is in the course of conversion.
It will use the agreed definitions, terminology
and standards of the International Council on Archives, and the name authority
standards of the National Council on Archives as far as is practicable. The
main project will co-operate with the prototype European Union Archive Network.
See main PID for full details.
See main PID for full details.
See main PID (Appendix 3) for full details.
The main project is split into four parts. In
order to reflect the differing natures of these four parts, two will be treated
as formal sub-projects and two will report directly to the project manager.
These four sub-projects are all split intellectually and practically into two
parts -
a. the production of the products needed to
create the infrastructure of the Scottish Archive Network
b. the subsequent exploitation and expansion of
these products.
The Project Manager will delegate authority and responsibility for this product to this team of specialists.
Top Level Finding Aid sub-project
Staffing
Team Leader, Dr Alan Borthwick (Grade B3)
3 Grade B1 curatorial staff to be appointed.
Detailed job descriptions of the posts mentioned are given
in Appendix 6.2.
This part of the main project will be regarded as a formal sub-project with its own sub-project board. This sub-project board will comprise Dr Borthwick, sub-project manager, Dr Barnes and Mr Arnott Wilson, Archivist, Edinburgh University. The views of the individual participating archives about their own Top Level Finding Aids will be taken fully into account by the sub-project board when the TLFAs are finally agreed.
For further details about the main project board, Users Group and Participating Archive Group, all of whom will have input to the work of this sub-project, see the main PID.
For details of how the main project intends to deliver products which
a) meet the users’ quality expectations, recognising that these in many cases will be subjective, and
b) conform with recognised archival, IT and financial quality standards
see the main PID.
The archival standards to be met are the International Standard for Archival Description (ISAD(G)), the rules for the (UK) National Name Authority File and the definitions of the International Council of Archives Dictionary of Archival Terminology.
A model project plan for the integration of the individual participating archive will be developed. This will ensure that the participating archive is fully aware of the timing, timescale, scope and resources required for the individual needs of the archive. This "project plan" will form the basis for the quality control of the process of taking on an archive.
Quality assurance of the completed top level finding aids will be carried out by individual review boards, to comprise the sub-project Team Leader, the head of the appropriate participating archive, and either the Project Manager or Mr Wilson.
The project management standards are those of PRINCE 2.
See Appendix 6.1.
The Heritage Lottery Fund will receive a monthly report, contained within the relevant sections of the main SCAN report referred to in Section 8 of the main PID.
Sub-Project Board meetings will be held at appropriate intervals. It is expected that the first meeting will occur after training workshops/seminars have been held with the participating archives and the standards to be applied within the sub-project have been discussed. Thereafter a meeting will occur once the first Top Level Finding Aid for a participating archive has been completed, to ensure that all standards have been applied and quality assurance adhered to; and similar meetings will occur once each subsequent Top Level Finding Aid has been completed.
Sub-Project team meetings will be held weekly. They will produce highlight reports every two weeks.
It will be the responsibility of Project Support to collect the information from the team leader to update their detailed team plans and to feed this into the top level plan of the Project Board. Microsoft Project will be used for this purpose.
See main PID for full details.
See main PID for full details.
Initial risk logs are given in Appendix 6.4.
The Team leader will ensure that each week the sub-project contributes to the weekly newsletter described in the main PID.
Regular meetings will be arranged with the Participating Archives Group and with the Users Group. Feedback from these two groups will be fully borne in mind. Sub-project staff will also frequently encounter participating archive staff when undertaking compilation of top level finding aids, and seek comments on progress of their work.
The first of the attached GANTT charts shows how
the sub-project is broken down into essential elements as the work begins
(including staff training, decisions about standards, seminars/workshops for
the participating archives) which must occur before the formal assessment of
the TLFA requirements of the participating archives can occur. Thereafter, the work comprises the assessment
visits, the subsequent data capture for the TLFAs, their approval, insertion
onto the SCAN web-site and normal maintenance of the TLFAs as months pass (to
take into account omissions or errors, for example).
The second chart shows a detailed break-down of
the steps involved once the arrangements are made to assess any one
participating archive up to the point that its TLFA has been compiled and is on
a care and maintenance basis. This model
would be replicated throughout the existence of the sub-project.
At the start of 1999 each of the participating
archives was asked when it would prefer to have its TLFA compiled. The likely schedule for data take-on is as
follows (alphabetical order only). There
will be some apparent duplication of names: some archives did not mind which
year they were included in. Some
archives have not decided as yet which year they wish to be in. Some re-scheduling of the take-on will have
to be undertaken, as there are too many archives at present who expressed a
preference to be in Year 1.
Aberdeen University Library Special Collections
and Archives
Angus Archives
Dundee University Archives
Falkirk Museums History Research Centre
Glasgow University Library Special Collections
Greater Glasgow Health Board
Highland Council Archive
Jordanhill Archives, University of Strathclyde
Orkney Archive
Perth & Kinross Council Archive
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of
Glasgow
Scottish Theatre Archive
South Lanarkshire Council Archives
The University of St Andrews
West Lothian Council
Aberdeen City Archives
Aberdeenshire Archives
Ayrshire Archives
Clan Donald Centre
Dumfries & Galloway Libraries, Information
and Archives
Dundee City Archives
Glasgow City Archives
Glasgow School of Art
Heriot-Watt University Archive
Midlothian Council
National Library of Scotland
North Lanarkshire Council Archives
Northern Health Services Archive
Scottish Borders Archive
Stirling Council Archives
The University of St Andrews
Clan Donald Centre
Glasgow City Archives
Glasgow School of Art
Midlothian Council
Royal College of Nursing Archives
Scottish Film and Television Archive
The Mount Stuart Trust Archive
The National Trust for Scotland
TOP LEVEL FINDING AID
SUB-PROJECT
To ensure that the top level finding aids of the
participating archives have been converted to ISAD(G) to agreed standards and
into electronic form; that they are available on the SCAN web site; that links
are provided from the web site to more detailed catalogues, where they exist in
electronic form; and that if no more detailed catalogue exists in electronic
form then statements about availability of catalogues in paper form are made.
·
to establish the standard for creation of
a typical TLFA entry by agreement with participating archives
·
to direct preliminary assessment of
participating archives to establish work required for each TLFA creation
·
to manage the production of the TLFAs
·
to direct the work of the TLFA
sub-project staff, including provision of appropriate training to equip staff
for their roles
·
to assist in the creation of TLFAs
·
to liaise with the participating archives
on this aspect of the overall scheme, including provision of appropriate
training seminars or workshops
·
to act as the SCAN quality controller for
the completed TLFA for each participating archive
·
to ensure that suitable links from SCAN
TLFAs exist to participating archives’ sites, where they exist, especially to
more detailed catalogues in electronic form
·
to keep abreast of developments in
creation and implementation of descriptive standards
·
to report to the Project Manager on
current progress
To undertake to agreed standards the creation of
top level finding aids for the participating archives under the direction of
the TLFA Project Team Leader.
·
to assist in the preliminary assessment
of participating archives to establish work required for each TLFA creation and
thereafter keep Team Leader up to date with current state of play within their
areas of responsibility
·
to undertake the creation of TLFAs as
directed by the Team Leader
·
to undertake initial check on TLFAs
presented by participating archives as complete for subsequent signing-off
·
to liaise with the participating archives
on this aspect of the overall scheme, including participation in appropriate
training seminars or workshops
TOP LEVEL FINDING AID SUB-PROJECT: QUALITY
ASSURANCE
Quality Criteria |
Quality Review Method |
Has each entry in a TLFA got all the essential
elements as agreed with participants as the adopted standard? |
Once agreed standard adopted ensure that all
SCAN TLFA staff understand what is required, and monitor their work. Same would apply to TLFA work undertaken
independently of SCAN staff. |
Are the TLFA entries produced accurate and
easy to understand? |
Undertake regular reviews of entries
produced. Consult participants and
User Group for views, especially when commencing TLFA creation for
participant with widely divergent fonds from those encountered so far. Assess comments received from users of web
site. |
Once the TLFA for a participant has been
completed, does it provide a fair view of fonds held by that participant? |
Establish means of final quality control check
with participants, whereby TLFA is signed off as agreed between participant’s
representative and TLFA project Team Leader.
Once TLFA established on web site, ensure that feedback from users is
assessed, and have review with participant of TLFA after 3 months. |
Is each participant’s TLFA up to date as
participants catalogue new accessions? |
Establish regular system for contacting
participants to learn of new catalogued accessions, and encourage them to
provide TLFA entries to allow their TLFAs to be updated. |
Do the TLFAs provide better access to archives
held by the participants than what was available before? |
Ensure that for each participant SCAN is clear
what the current state of play is in each participant as regards basic
finding aids/summary catalogues before TLFA creation commences. Seek views of User Group, and users at
large (including comments received via SCAN ‘Coffee Machine’), of how
particular TLFAs have improved access to archives. |
Has introduction of TLFAs increased usage of
archives held by participants? |
Seek views of participants about level of
usage, including comments in their published reports. For NAS, check on level of demand for
digitised documents or other copies where copy requests fed through SCAN. |
Are the links from SCAN TLFA entries to more
detailed on-line catalogues clear, unambiguous and easy to follow? |
Liaise closely with SCAN IT staff; test links
regularly; check with User Group and users at large for their comments. |
Are TLFA staff generally content with their
lot? |
Ensure staff motivation maintained by offering
range of duties wherever possible.
Poor work likely to reflect lack of motivation, excess of work or
other dissatisfaction with working practices, and will harm output. |
Are tasks expected of TLFA staff stretching or
impossible? |
TLFA Team Leader must monitor production of
entries carefully: poor work may imply staff over-stretched or lack
understanding of what is required. |
Is it clear to participants which member of
TLFA staff is responsible for what part of the project? |
To ensure participants are aware of individual
range of responsibilities, ensure participants introduced to TLFA staff and
that they in turn have regular chances to meet participants. |
|
|
TOP LEVEL FINDING AID SUB-PROJECT: RISK
ASSESSMENT
Risk |
Probability |
Impact and Potential result |
How the risk will be minimised |
Inability to agree standards for TLFA entries
with participating archives |
low/medium |
medium/high - could cause participants to
withdraw |
Ensure TLFA staff are well-trained in
standards proposed to be adopted, and in alternative methods currently in use
elsewhere. Maintain good contacts with
participants, and review feedback regularly |
Withdrawal of participating archives, perhaps
through unhappiness with SCAN or wish to pursue own projects |
low/medium |
medium - could cause rescheduling of
work-flow; possible negative publicity |
Maintain good links with participants
throughout project. Have fall-back
options available to meet possible withdrawals. |
Inability to agree with participating archives
on schedule for their take-on of data |
low |
medium - could cause rescheduling of
work-flow; possible negative publicity |
Have fall-back options available to meet
possible re-scheduling |
Inability of TLFA staff to deal timeously with
data capture for participating archives |
low/medium |
medium/high - could require major rescheduling
of work-flow; possible negative publicity |
Maintain regular reviews of work in progress
throughout project. Consider temporary
deployment of additional staff if problem areas are short-term |
|
|
|
|
Inability to agree TLFA produced for any one
participating archive |
low |
low/medium - could require significant
revision of work already done |
Establish quality control checks to monitor
work in progress, including liaison with participants; encourage feedback
from them about practical aspects of standards applied |
Significant slippage of whole TLFA project,
perhaps because of inability to capture timeously necessary information to
agreed standards |
medium |
medium/high - if slippage cannot be rectified
then expected results of whole project could be jeopardised |
Constant consideration of state of play; could
lead to further discussion about overall standards to be applied to TLFA
format |
Appearance of any one participating archive’s
TLFA on web-site causes significant volume of reader requests to that archive |
medium |
medium/high - some participants unlikely to be
able to cope with flood of requests because of lack of staff |
Liaise closely with each participant as launch
of their TLFA nears; monitor results of previous launches; if participant
unable to cope with possible avalanche of requests consider delaying launch
date of their TLFA |
Testaments
Sub-Project Initiation Document
Hazel Anderson
Team Leader Testaments Project
Scottish Archive Network
10/6/1999
Access to Scottish archives is hampered because
users and potential users find it difficult or impossible to find out what
information is available and which archives hold what information. There are
further difficulties added, in that much of the information is available only
in central Edinburgh and even when these difficulties are overcome old paper
catalogues may be very difficult to use because of their complexity or size.
This sub-project will greatly improve access to
a major primary source of Scottish history by creating a single index to all
registered Scottish testaments (wills) and inventories before 1876 and then
linking each entry to a digital image of the actual documents which make up
these records. This union index of persons, places, occupations and dates will
be searchable via the SCAN website on the Internet. It will be possible to
search in the electronic search room for,
for example
all the wills of the residents of Falkland from
1600 to 1700
all the wills of Glasgow bakers between 1800 and
1850
as well as the wills of specific people, famous
or not.
The digital images,
which will be available on computer screens in the NAS historical search room,
will have tools for enlarging, sharpening and improving faint or unclear text.
The sub-project will
also ensure the long-term preservation of this material. After digital capture
the testaments will be placed in environmentally controlled storage and all
subsequent consultation will be via the digital image.
· to convert the various indexes to Scottish testaments, 1500-1875, to electronic form and link them electronically to digital images of the testaments.
·
to make the indexes available to
searchers on the SCAN website
·
to make the electronic images linked to
the relevant index entries available to readers in the NAS historical search
room (HSR) in place of the original documents.
· to improve the preservation conditions of the original testaments.
· to provide a report on the technical, financial and preservation implications of large-scale digitisation of archive material, in the light of the project experience.
The implementation of
the Testaments sub-project will be carried out by the sub-project team.
The Testaments
sub-project will use Prince 2 project management methodology and Microsoft Project.
The detailed
sub-project plan for Testaments is available at Appendix 7.1. This will be
monitored by the Sub-Project Board (see below Project Organisation Structure).
· the 475,000 index entries to Scottish testaments, 1500-1875, converted to electronic form and linked to digital images of the testaments; the indexes made available over the Internet without financial charge by the Scottish Archive Network.
· the Scottish Archive Network site on the Internet will aim to be available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. In practice the target to be met will be 95% of that time.
· the original paper testaments placed in phase boxes and withdrawn from public consultation.
· microfilm or hard copy surrogates in the historical search room, in place of original documents, until the digital images are available.
· a report published on the technical, financial and preservation implications of large-scale digitisation of archive material, in the light of the project experience.
The scope of the sub-project is limited to the
deliverables and outcomes listed above.
The Testaments sub-project will not include any
wills after 1875.
It will not provide electronic images of
documents on the SCAN web-site.
It will not provide access to any original
documents after they are withdrawn for digital capture.
The Testaments sub-project will cooperate with
the National Archives of Scotland
·
with Preservation Services -
Reprographics in ensuring advance notice of requirements for copy microfilms to
be used as surrogates in the search room;
·
with Preservation Services - Conservation
and Bindery to ensure close liaison between SCAN and NAS conservators over
assessment and procedures;
·
with Preservation Services - Location
System to ensure storage space for conserved documents;
·
with Court and Legal Records to
facilitate electronic capture of Sheriff Court indexes;
·
with Reader Services in ensuring advance
notice of all withdrawals of original documents, provision of surrogate copies
and access by staff to the linked digital images and index entries before
general public access.
See main PID
See main PID
See main
PID
See main PID for Project Organisation Structure
Detailed job descriptions of the posts described
below are given in Appendix 7.2.
Testaments sub-project
The main project is split into four parts. As a
sub-project, Testaments will have its own sub-project board initially
comprising Dr Ishbel Barnes, Dr John Shaw and Mrs Hazel Anderson, team leader.
Like the other three sub-projects, Testaments is split intellectually and
practically into two parts - a. the production of the products needed to create
the infrastructure of the Scottish Archive Network and b. the subsequent
exploitation and expansion of these products.
Testaments Sub-Project Team
Team Leader Grade B3 Mrs Hazel Anderson
Curator Grade
B1/2 To be Appointed
Conservator Grade B2 Mr Peter Dickson
Conservators (2) Grade B1/2 To be appointed
Digitising supervisor GSU
appointee
Digitising quality controllers (2) GSU volunteers
Digitisers (8) GSU volunteers
The quality review method is detailed in
Appendix 7.3.
Quality assurance of index/digital image linking
will be delivered by the team leader, who will personally check 10% of all
links.
Quality assurance of digital images will be
delivered by the two quality controllers, who will monitor 10% of all images
captured, reporting to the digitising supervisor.
A User Group will be established to insure that
the Special Archive Services project is aware of general user needs and views.
See Appendix 7.1
Sub-Project team meetings will be held weekly.
The sub-project team will produce highlight reports every two weeks.
Project Board members will hold regular progress
meetings with team leaders.
Project Board meetings will be held at least
every month.
It will be the responsibility of Project Support
to collect the information from the Testaments team leader to update the
detailed team plan and to feed this into the top level plan of the Project
Board. Microsoft Project will be used
for this purpose.
See main PID
If the monthly plan
for the Testaments is not fulfilled the Sub-Project Board will report this to
the Project Board along with proposals for returning the project to the agreed
plans.
The initial risk log is included in appendix 7.4
This sub-project risk
log will be submitted regularly to the Project Board.
See main PID
Project 3 Testaments
the automation of the commissary catalogues, the
digital imaging of the testaments, the linking of these two elements and their
final inclusion in the SCAN electronic search room
·
to produce a detailed implementation plan
for the project in collaboration with staff of the NAS Historical Search Room
and Preservation Services Branch
·
to establish a quality circle in
association with the NAS search room, the GSU supervisor and conservation with
agreed production targets
·
to establish and implement digital
imaging standards and quality controls and liaise with SCAN IT staff on
digitising strategies
·
to establish and monitor a programme of
electronic capture of the commissary catalogues
·
to establish and implement with the
Curatorial B1 a system to ensure that each digital image is linked to an index
entry
·
to establish and implement in association
with the digitising supervisor standards of document handling and equipment
operation
·
to organise induction training for the
GSU volunteer digitisers
·
to line manage SCAN Testaments staff
·
to establish and monitor realistic
targets and report on progress to the project manager
·
to act as central point of liaison
between SCAN Testaments staff and Historical Search Room staff
to assist the team leader in organising the automation
of the commissary catalogues and linking the images with the index entries
·
to implement system of linking of index
entries to digital images
·
to assist team leader in ensuring that
electronic capture of the indexes proceeds according to planned targets
·
to ensure accuracy of index entries and
legibility of digital images
·
to supply missing entries where indexes
are incomplete
·
to assist team leader in liaison with
staff of the Historical Search Room
to advise the team leader on all aspects of
conservation, as well as providing conservation support for Special Archive
Services
to prepare the testaments for digital capture
and subsequently preserve them for permanent storage
·
to assess conservation needs of all
material to be digitally captured
·
to select appropriate conservation
techniques, treatments and materials
·
to ensure necessary preservation and
storage of material after digital capture
·
to oversee out-of-house binding of hard
copy surrogates
·
to maintain accurate records of work
undertaken and materials used
·
to line manage the two conservators
(Grade B1)
·
to liaise with NAS conservation staff and
ensure agreement on treatments and procedures
·
to implement document handling training
for SCAN digitising and other staff as required
·
to advise SCAN staff on preservation
issues as appropriate
·
to report on progress to the team leader
to assist the chief conservator in all aspects
of preparation and preservation of digitally captured material
·
to carry out a full range of conservation
techniques as directed by the chief conservator
·
to assist in the maintenance of accurate
records of work undertaken
·
to assist the chief conservator in
liaison with NAS conservation staff and in implementation of document handling
training for SCAN staff
to maintain the work flow through the
digitisation process and manage the team of GSU volunteers
·
to maintain the workflow according to
agreed performance targets and quality control
·
to maintain statistics for performance
measures
·
to allocate tasks for digitising and
quality control among the team of volunteers
·
to ensure and monitor agreed standards of
document handling and equipment operation in the team
·
to log failure and faults in equipment
and arrange repair and maintenance
·
to report to the team leader and keep her
informed of any difficulties arising within the volunteer team
to check a selected quantity of images for
accuracy, clarity, contrast and legibility to agreed standards
·
to check numbering and references for
accuracy
·
to record quality check information
·
where quality falls below agreed
standards to highlight batch and arrange with the supervisor for
re-digitisation
·
to undertake straightforward indexing
work if required
to capture digital images and accurate
associated metadata to standards laid down by the team leader and monitored by
the digitising supervisor
·
to inspect captured images for quality
·
to maintain statistics of individual
output
·
to report any failure or faults in
equipment to digitising supervisor
·
to handle material to be digitised in
accordance with induction training
Quality Criteria |
Quality Review Method |
Are all the document references and page
numbers accurate? |
Introduce checking
system devised by curatorial and conservation staff. |
Are the volumes and individual documents in a
fit state to be digitally captured? |
All volumes and
documents to be assessed and treated by conservation staff to ensure ease of
handling and legibility of extant text. |
Are the digital images of a uniform standard
of legibility? |
Digital imaging
standards to be agreed with the digitising supervisor and maintained by all
GSU staff, with particular responsibility for monitoring by quality control
staff and the supervisor. |
Are the hard copy surrogates legible for
readers, with bindings of suitable quality to withstand reasonable handling? |
Hard copies to be quality controlled by same
procedures as digital images. Bindings to be carried out to the
specification of the chief conservator and monitored by him. |
Are the index entries automated to a very high
degree of accuracy? |
Clear instructions and guidelines, as agreed
by contract, to accompany all out-of-house typing. |
Are index entries and digital images matched
to a very high level of accuracy? |
Counter-checking system to be included in
curatorial editing procedure. |
Are readers satisfied with access to the
testaments in the electronic search room? |
Monitor results of preliminary staff access to
images in search room and consult User Group. Ensure maximum delay of 1
minute between selection of image and its appearance on the screen. |
Are there fewer elementary enquiries from
users about Scottish wills? |
Monitor search room enquiries and consult User
Group with a view to improving background information on testaments on the
SCAN web-site. |
Risk |
Probability |
Impact
and Potential result |
How
the risk will be minimised |
1 General |
|||
1.1 Failure to achieve deadlines |
low/medium |
medium - delay, increased costs |
Set reasonable goals, train staff adequately,
continually monitor output and assess/readjust project plans if necessary.
Ensure adequate equipment specifications and maintenance contracts.
Insurance? |
2 Equipment |
|||
2.1 Digitising equipment failure |
low/medium |
high - could cause significant delays in
implementation of project. |
Ensure all equipment conforms to tender brief
and product description; suppliers’ contracts to allow for trial period of
use, regular servicing and provision of substitute equipment in event of
failure (or emergency call-out for repairs). Provide adequate staff training
and supervision to ensure correct use of equipment. |
2.2 Loss of captured images |
low/medium |
high - could cause significant disruption to
project workflow |
Download uncompressed images from each
volume/bundle to tape after capture. Upload compressed images to server after
capture. Store them in separate locations and monitor them regularly. Delay post-capture conservation and storage to
facilitate re-capture if necessary. |
3 Staff |
|||
3.1 Liaison difficulties within Conservation
Services (CS) between NAS and SCAN staff |
medium |
medium - could cause
disagreement over assessment and treatment procedures and delay project
workflow. |
Define and agree SCAN conservation duties with
CS manager, allocate working area and clarify equipment/materials procurement
procedures for SCAN. Encourage exchange of ideas and suggestions at
regular meetings of senior CS and SCAN Testaments staff. Provide management training for SCAN chief
conservator. |
3.2 Failure by GSU to provide sufficient
volunteers for digital capture |
low |
high - could cause
significant delay to implementation of Testaments project |
Ensure that agreement with GSU guarantees 11
volunteers for the duration of the project. Any shortfall to be made up by
non-GSU digitisers (at GSU expense ?). Agree minimum attendance levels for volunteers
per week/month/year. |
3.3 Conservation or digitising staff
incapacitated |
low/medium |
low/medium - could
cause significant disruption to workflow |
Make contingency
plans for adjusting workflow timetable for conservation and digital capture
if staffing temporarily reduced; plans to include temporary re-allocation
of simpler procedures to other staff,
if possible. |
Risk |
Probability |
Impact
and Potential result |
How
the risk will be minimised |
3 Staff (continued) |
|||
3.4 Index entries automated with high rate of
error |
low/medium |
low/medium - could
greatly increase workload for curatorial staff and delay implementation of
retrieval system for SCAN electronic searchroom |
Ensure clarity of instructions to typing
agency and determine maximum difficulty levels of work for which staff are capable. Liaise with GSU to assess ability of
digitisers to assist in preparation of
MS indexes for automation. Adjust work plans accordingly. |
3.5 High rate of digital re-capture |
low (decreasing
during project) |
medium - could cause
significant disruption to project workflow |
Ensure correct technical definition for
digital capture of each volume/bundle. Ensure proper training and supervision of all
digitising staff. Set realistic work rates and provide intensive
quality control at start of project. |
3.6 Mismatching of index entries and digital
images |
low |
high - could cause
delay in implementation of retrieval system for SCAN electronic search room |
Ensure curatorial staff have good palaeography
skills. Plan and implement double-check for matching
up procedures; ensure sufficient resources for correction of index entries or
creation of new ones. Liaise with Historical Search Room to ensure
speedy reporting of errors by staff and readers to Testaments curatorial team |
3.7 Liaison difficulties between Testaments project
and Historical Search Room staff and readers |
medium |
high - could cause resistance to Testaments
project, particularly to denial of access to original records |
Agree timetable for
withdrawal of records and provision of surrogates. Post notices in
search room to inform readers in good time of withdrawal of original records. Maintain regular
contact with search room staff and User’s Group and produce regular
information on project progress. Implement staff
access to audit trail database, so that progress of individual
volumes/bundles can be monitored. |
4. Users |
|
|
|
4.1 Resistance by readers to Testaments
package in Historical Search Room. |
low |
low - could cause additional work for search
room staff and create bad publicity for SCAN |
Ensure good
background information on web-site, to include ‘help’ facility. Ensure search room
staff are familiar with testaments retrieval procedures. No reader access
allowed to original testaments. |
4.2 Misuse or ‘piracy’ of digital images on
intranet/(Internet) |
low |
low/medium - could cause contractual
difficulties and high legal fees |
Ensure clear
agreement with GSU on their use of the images. Index entries only
on Internet. Images to
incorporate logo or wording to indicate provenance. |
4.3 Overwhelming volume of orders for copies
by internet and personal users |
medium |
medium - could disrupt ordering procedures of
copies for other categories of records |
Monitor demand for
microfilm and photocopies over next 2 1/2 years and allow for initial 5x
increase in orders. Ensure purchase of sufficient printers to meet expected
demand. Ensure procedures for processing orders are fully worked out with
Historical Search Room and Reprographics staff before Testaments available on
line. |
Special Archive Services
Sub-Project Initiation Document
Joanna Baird
Team Leader Archive Services
Scottish Archive Network
June 1999
Access to Scottish archives is hampered because
users and potential users find it difficult or impossible to find out what
information is available and which archives hold that information. There are
further difficulties added, in that much of the information is available only
in central Edinburgh and even when these difficulties are overcome old paper
catalogues may be very difficult to use because of their complexity or size.
Though some Scottish Archives already have their own web-sites, many do not and
this means that, generally speaking, there is no central point of reference in
Scotland for information about the holdings of Scottish Archives. This often
means that archive users may spend a considerable amount of time being passed
from archive to archive and archive staff waste valuable time answering similar
questions over and over again.
The Special Archive Services Project will
alleviate these difficulties by providing a
Scottish Archive Network web-site which will act as the central point of
reference for information about Scottish Archives. The content of this web-site
will eventually prove vital to both users and archive staff alike. Scottish
Archive Network users will be able to find out the answers to questions such as
‘How do I trace my family history’ and ‘What are the opening hours of this
archive?’ as well as being able to purchase publications and view exhibitions
centrally. A knowledge data base of
Scottish history will be created which will be searchable electronically over
the Internet. This project will also provide the forum for accessing the 2
major products of the Scottish Archive Network - namely the Top Level Finding
Aids and the Scottish testaments to 1875.
Initially 45 Scottish archives will participate in the Network. The National Archives of Scotland is the
major participant in this project.
·
To provide a forum for users to have
access to the other principal products of the Scottish Archive Network - namely
an electronic searchable facility for the 45 participating Scottish archives,
the top level finding aids of the participating archives in electronic form and
the various indexes to Scottish testaments, 1500-1875 in electronic form linked
electronically to digital images of the documents.
·
to construct a knowledge data base of
1000 key themes of Scottish history from sources in participating archives and
make it searchable electronically over the Internet.
·
to develop a range of other services to
enhance the electronic search room, including exhibitions, a bookshop, “coffee
machine” (themed discussion groups), yellow pages and Noticeboard for Scottish
archives, all searchable electronically over the Internet.
·
to
advise the National Archives of Scotland on their web-site content
The implementation of the Special Archive
Services sub-project will be carried out by the sub-project team.
The SAS sub-project will use Prince 2 project
management methodology and Microsoft Project.
The detailed sub-project plan for Special
Archive Services is available at Appendix 8.1. This will be monitored by the
Project Board (see below Project Organisation Structure).
· a knowledge data base of 1000 key themes in Scottish history, covering 450 subjects, 250 places, 250 people and 50 ‘how tos’ searchable electronically over the Internet; these will be made available without financial charge by the Scottish Archive Network.
· an electronic bookshop, coffee machine, yellow pages and noticeboard for Scottish archives made available and searchable electronically over the Internet without financial charge by the Scottish Archive Network.
· a family history service made available over the Internet without financial charge by the Scottish Archive Network.
· 20 archival exhibitions made available over the Internet without financial charge by the Scottish Archive Network.
· a medium for accessing the TLFA of the participant archives
· a medium for accessing the 475,000 index entries to Scottish testaments, 1500-1875, linked to digital images of the documents.
· the Scottish Archive Network site on the Internet will aim to be available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
The scope of the sub-project is limited to the
deliverables and outcomes listed above.
The definition of participant archive is an institution with a full or
near full-time archivist.
The Special Archive Services sub-project will
not provide web-sites to those participating archives who do not already have
them (with the exception of the National Archives of Scotland).
Its work will be made available to other UK
networks but in the initial three years there is no obligation to further
harmonisation.
The Special Archive Services sub-project will
cooperate with the National Archives of Scotland
·
with Publications and Education Branch in
providing facilities for electronic exhibitions and publications
·
with Reader Services in ensuring
agreement on the content of the NAS web-site
The Special Archive Services sub-project will
liaise with the participating archives regarding the content of the Scottish
Archive Network web-site.
See main PID
See main PID
See main
PID
SAS sub-project:
Special Archive Services
The main project is split into four parts (refer
to main PID for further details). As a sub-project, Special Archive Services
will report directly to the project manager. Like the other three sub-projects,
SAS is split intellectually and practically into two parts - a. the production
of the products needed to create the infrastructure of the Scottish Archive
Network and b. the subsequent exploitation and expansion of these products.
Special Archive Services Sub-Project
Sub- Project Team
Team Leader Grade B3 Ms Joanna Baird
Curator Grade
B1/2 To be Appointed
Imaging Technicians (2) Grade B1 To
be appointed
This part of the project will not be regarded as
a formal sub-project. Ms Baird will report directly to the Project Manager.
Detailed job descriptions of all the posts described above are given in
Appendix 8.2.
The quality review method is detailed in
Appendix 8.3.
Quality assurance of knowledge base entries will
be assured by the team leader and the submitting institution. The NAS web-site
will be quality-assured by NAS staff.
The SCAN web-site content will be assured by the Project Board and the
participating archives where relevant.
A User Group will be established to insure that
the Special Archive Services project is aware of general user needs and views.
See Appendix 8.1
Sub-Project team meetings will be held weekly.
The sub-project team will produce highlight reports ever two weeks.
Project Board members will hold weekly progress
meetings with team leaders.
Project Board meetings will be held at least
every month.
It will be the responsibility of Project Support
to collect the information from the Special Archive Services team leader to
update the detailed team plan and to feed this into the top level plan of the
Project Board. Microsoft Project will
be used for this purpose.
See main PID
If the monthly sub-project plan for Special
Archive Services is not fulfilled the Project Board will report this to the
Project Board along with proposals for returning the project to the agreed
plans.
The initial risk log is included in appendix 8.4
This sub-project risk log will be submitted
regularly to the Project Board.
There will be regular contact with NAS staff and
the participating archives. See main PID for further details about overall
communication strategy and plan.
To construct a knowledge database of 1000 key
themes from Scottish history from sources in participating archives and make it
searchable electronically over the Internet.
To develop a range of other services to enhance the electronic search
room including exhibitions, a bookshop, “coffee machine”, yellow pages and
noticeboard for Scottish archives, all searchable electronically over the
Internet.
·
Co-ordinating staff effort for the
collection, data capture, standardisation and quality control of all material
for special archive services
·
Manager for the Special Archive Services
project
·
Establish and monitor realistic targets
and report on progress to the Project Manager
·
Plan implementation and stages for
Special Archive Services
·
Establish framework for Special Archive
Services material
·
Research widely for new and innovative
approaches to archives services on the Internet
·
Plan and implement testing strategy for
Special Archive Services
·
Liaise with user groups to test
usefulness and quality of Special Archive Services
·
Assess and develop sources of material to
contribute to Special Archive Services and plan their conversion for
implementation in Special Archive Services
·
Editing and developing material for
Special Archive Services
·
Implementation of management information
in Special Archive Services
·
responsible for all SCAN copyright and
intellectual property rights matters and for the development of sales and
marketing.
To assist with the preparation of information
for the SCAN and NAS web-sites.
·
Editing and developing material for
knowledge database
·
Selection of material to be digitised for
all areas of archive services
·
Oversee data capture of material for
archive services
·
Oversee data capture for exhibitions,
publications, yellow pages and coffee machine facilities
To prepare images of documents for use over the
internet.
·
Prepare materials for digitising
·
Capture digital images
·
Capture accurate associated metadata
·
Inspect images for quality
·
Maintain statistics
·
Liaise with NAS in training other
reprographic staff in digitisation
Quality Criteria |
Quality Review Method |
Is the content of the knowledge database
accurate, clear and easy to follow? |
Introduce system of
quality control whereby style and content/format of entries is determined and
approved in advance by SCAN staff, SCAN user group. Circulate sample of
entries on knowledge database internally to NAS staff as well as to SCAN user
group and participating archives for comment and review. |
Are the images clear and easy to follow and
linked to the correct entries ? |
Monitor result of
test version in search room and circulate samples of sites internally to NAS
staff as well as to SCAN user group and participating archives for comment
and review. |
Are the web-sites (SCAN and NAS) easy to
negotiate/use and pleasing to look at ? |
Monitor result of
test version in search room and circulate samples of sites internally to NAS
staff as well as to SCAN user group and participating archives for comment
and review. |
Is the amount of enquiries/sales/visitors to
the web-site increasing ? |
Use on-line monitoring system to determine
numbers of users. Create and maintain
system for monitoring number of additional enquiries/sales generated by SCAN |
Is the amount of very general genealogical
enquiries to the NAS/participating archives decreasing as a direct result of
information provided by SCAN? |
Monitor nature and quantity of search room
enquiries received directly as a result of web-site. Get feedback from NAS search room staff as
to success of project in terms of freeing up staff time/reducing time spent answering
trivial and general enquiries |
Is the public reaction to the web-site and its
contents a positive one ? |
Include facility for user comments on web-site
at a variety of levels, monitor responses and react accordingly |
Is it easy to negotiate the electronic search
room? (some links with TLFA project?) |
Monitor results of test version of web-site in
search room. Include facility for user comments at a variety of levels,
encourage feedback from participating archives, SCAN user group, NAS staff
etc. |
Are we receiving positive feedback from the
participating archives? |
Maintain links with participating archives at
all times through visits, e-mails, etc. and keep open forum for discussion,
review and comment |
Risk |
Probability |
Impact
and Potential result |
How
the risk will be minimised |
1 General |
|||
1.1 Failure to achieve deadlines |
low/medium |
medium - delay, increased costs |
Set reasonable goals, train staff adequately,
continually monitor output and assess/readjust project plans if necessary. |
2 Equipment and Staff |
|||
2.1 IT equipment failure |
low/medium |
high - could cause significant delays in
initial stages of project and loss of information. |
Ensure continual liaison with IT staff, proper maintenance of equipment and
provision of back-up for data. Provide
adequate staff training in use of IT equipment. Ensure that alternatives will be available
in event of equipment failure. |
2.2 Problems in recruitment/staff retention |
low/medium |
high - could cause significant delays to project, divergent standards and lack of
continuity |
Give project staffing a high priority within
SCAN. Once posts are filled, ensure
that postholders have a high level of job satisfaction, motivation, interest
and variety and that staff have input to project. Comprehensive induction and training will
assist with retention. |
3 Organisation and content of web-site |
|||
3.1 Delay in launch of NAS web-site |
medium |
medium - high could cause poor PR
for NAS and resultant poor relations between SCAN and NAS |
Make realistic goals. Give NAS web-site a high
priority in the time schedule and ensure that the preparation stages are
carefully managed and that enough staff time is devoted to the web-site so
that the results are of a high quality.
Also ensure that NAS staff are given a say in the web-site content
throughout as a means of quality control. |
3.2 Delay in launch of SCAN web-site |
low |
medium could cause poor PR
for SCAN and resultant poor relations between SCAN and participating archives |
Plan realistically and using experience gained
during formation of prototypes and NAS web-site. If necessary re-adjust time scales to
ensure that completed product is of an acceptably high standard. Ensure that
participating archives and users group are involved in the ongoing work of
creating the final product. |
3.3 Lack of time between starting project and
projected launch of web-site |
high |
medium - may create
negative publicity and mean that standards have to be lowered and priorities
re-evaluated to fit in with new timescale |
Decide in advance on
essential elements[2]
which will need to be in place for launch of web-site and concentrate on
these aspects in available time period. Consider implications of re-adjusting
time-scales and/or changing date of official launch. |
Risk |
Probability |
Impact
and Potential result |
How
the risk will be minimised |
3 Organisation and content of web-site
(continued) |
|||
3.4 Massive volume of response to launch of
web-site |
medium |
medium - may result
in necessary diversion/redistribution of staff priorities - and lead to
delays in other areas |
Prior to launch of web-site carefully consider
how enquiries should be handled, create enquiries form and ensure that vague
and genealogical enquiries can be filtered out at web-site level. Try to anticipate needs of users and user profiles
as far as possible. Liaise with NAS search rooms to ensure that they are in
agreement with this approach. |
3.5 Poor response to web-site |
low |
low - may need to
result in re-evaluation of contents and layout |
Study approach and success rate of other
archival web-sites. Create marketing
strategy for web-site to ensure effective links - leading to widespread
dissemination and distribution of information. Monitor public responses to
trial version of SCAN web-site contents prior to launch of web-site. Be
prepared to respond to criticism and react pro-actively to all feedback. Monitor web-site usage, comments, coffee
room and current news to ensure that web-site is responsive and topical at
all times. |
3.6 Massive volume of requests for copies of
specific documents |
medium - high |
medium - may
overload staff resources and disrupt staff priorities causing delays |
Liaise with search rooms and reprographic
department to assess impact of sudden influx of reprographic requests. Negotiate plan for dealing with photocopying
requests. Find some way of documents
or channelling requests for specific documents in an organised manner. ‘Build
in’ warning about delays in processing orders at the request stage so that
users do not have unrealistic expectations.
Consider implications of providing a ‘digitise on demand’ service |
3.7 E-commerce system fails |
medium |
medium - may cause delays in other aspects of
the project and give a poor image of SCAN |
Ensure that any
e-commerce system is tested thoroughly to ensure that it is capable of
handling projected volume of requests. |
3.8 Information not updated regularly/out of
date links |
low |
low - may give poor image of SCAN |
Ensure that a
curator is responsible for updating information on a regular and systematic
basis. Ensure that correct software is
in place for updating any URL links. |
3.9 Lack of information about usage (stats) |
low |
low - may result in inability to respond to
usage/demand |
Ensure that correct
software is in place to monitor usage statistics. |
3.10 Inconsistent quality of entries in
knowledge data base |
low |
medium - may cause negative feedback and
delays in relaying relevant information |
Introduce system of
quality control whereby nature, style, content and length of individual
entries is standardised wherever possible in advance. Ensure that SCAN Users group endorse style
and sample content. Circulate sample
entries to relevant parties on a regular basis for comment. This should include NAS staff, SCAN user
group and participating archives. Monitor any feedback and react accordingly. |
Risk |
Probability |
Impact
and Potential result |
How
the risk will be minimised |
||
|
4
Relationships/partnerships (continued) |
||||
|
4.1 Lack of information from and contact with
participating archives |
low |
medium - may have detrimental effect on
content of SCAN web-site and links |
Maintain regular
mutual relationship from outset ensuring that participating archives are kept
well-informed. Carry out systematic
program of visits and surveys to ensure that SCAN intentions, timetables and
staff are well known to partner archives. Introduce regular programs of
regional meetings so that participating archives have the opportunity to meet
up with fellow participating archives to exchange information and
experiences. |
|
4.2 Poor relationship between SCAN and NAS |
low |
medium - may have detrimental effect on
current and future projects which rely on sources provided by the NAS |
Maintain regular
contact with the NAS from the outset ensuring that there are continual points
of liaison throughout the various stages of the project. Ensure that the NAS are consulted on any
issues that directly effect staff and public of the NAS. Stress the benefits of a good partnership
between SCAN and NAS. |
||
Information and Communications Technology
Sub-Project PID
10 June, 1999
This document describes the initial Information
and Communications Technology (ICT) project of the Scottish Archive Network.
Scotland has a
magnificent archival heritage and Scots of every age want access to it wherever
they reside. Every year more and more people visit archives and the two fastest
growing areas are genealogy and local history. However, access to the information
available in archives is hampered for the following reasons
·
Searchers do not know what information is
available
·
Searchers do not know which archives hold
what information
·
Much of the information is only available
in central Edinburgh during working hours
·
Even if searchers know where to look, old
paper catalogues may be almost impossible to search because of their complexity
and size.
The Scottish Archive Network (SCAN) has been created in response to these challenges. SCAN is an independent limited company, has charitable status, and has a mission
To
advance, promote, maintain, improve and encourage the education of the public
in the appreciation of Scotland’s history and in particular its documentary
heritage by means of providing public access to Scotland’s archives
SCAN will accomplish its mission by creating a browsable search room with catalogues linked to digital images of the documents. A knowledge database of Scottish history will be created which will be searchable remotely over the Internet. Initially, 45 Scottish archives will participate in the network, the largest of which is the National Archives of Scotland. The first digitisation project will be the testaments from 1500 to 1875, a major primary source of Scottish history comprising some 3,000,000 document pages. Funding for the first three years of SCAN has been agreed with the Heritage Lottery Fund donating £2.9 million, and the National Archives of Scotland and the Genealogical Society of Utah donating £1 million between them.
SCAN start-up activities are being run in four parallel streams or projects.
|
Name |
Description |
Available at Launch
? |
Project
1 |
Top
Level Finding Aids |
This will consolidate the top-level catalogues
of the participating archives into one super catalogue and provide
intelligent search facilities for interrogating it. It will also incorporate
the NAS catalogue at all levels. |
Yes |
Project
2 |
Special
Archive Services |
Yes |
|
Project
3 |
Digitisation
of Wills |
Wills
from 1500 to 1875 will be digitised and linked to a searchable index. Access
to the images will be available as a chargeable service. |
No |
Project
4 |
ICT
Infrastructure |
Provision
of all hardware, software, networks, and associated services to support SCAN
activities. A significant element is the co-ordination with the NAS
infrastructure upgrade which is required to accommodate SCAN. |
Yes |
It
is likely that other projects will be initiated during the life cycle of the
first four projects as the scope and reach of SCAN grows.
The
National Archives of Scotland [3](NAS)
is a key sponsor of the SCAN initiative. All of the staff employed by SCAN are
seconded from NAS. Any staff employed on the project from outwith NAS will be
recruited to NAS on a fixed term contract and seconded to SCAN for the
duration. All of the SCAN facilities will be co-located within the NAS Thomas
Thomson building at Sighthill on the outskirts of Edinburgh.
·
The Scottish Archive Network – A Proposal
for the Heritage Lottery Fund, November 1997
·
SCAN Project Initiation Document, Version
1.0, June 1999
·
SCAN ICT Work Breakdown Structure,
Version 1.0, March 1999
·
SCAN ICT Project Plan, Version 1.0, March
1999, Microsoft Project 95 Object
·
NAS Infrastructure Upgrade Specification,
March 1999
A web-site has been created for holding
information that is relevant to all parties interested in transacting with
SCAN. The site is not linked to the SCAN home page and the full URL (web
address) must be explicitly used which is
http://www.scan.org.uk/detail
This URL must not be passed on or appear as a
link on any web-site without the express permission of SCAN
The primary business goal of this project is -
To give SCAN an ICT
infrastructure which will accommodate the needs of the business, is scaleable,
year 2000 compliant, and able to support data format transitions over many
years
Accommodating the
needs of the business |
Defined in the
functional objectives below |
Scaleable |
The nature of
Internet access means that it is not possible to predict demand with any
degree of accuracy. The infrastructure must cope with rapid growth without
the need for fundamental redesign |
Year 2000 compliant |
Self-evident |
Able to support data
format transitions over many years |
SCAN is an archive
in which digital data will be held indefinitely. Current data storage formats
and media must be chosen such that they can be migrated to new forms when
appropriate |
The SCAN Information and Communications
Technology Infrastructure must -
meet all of the
specified application access and hard-copy requirements
meet all of the
digitisation and storage longevity requirements
be resilient and
deliver consistently high levels of service availability
operate to the desired
levels of performance
provide a secure
service for internal users and administrators
provide a secure link
to the Internet
integrate with the NAS
ICT infrastructure but be logically and administratively separate
be able to accommodate
business growth (assume 100% web serving growth in one year) without redesign
be able to accommodate
application additions and deletions without redesign
ensure that all
participating archive data and user data is stored on servers
allow roaming users to
access their applications and data from any browser-enabled desktop
provide a test and
change control environment for web-content and applications
The project shall be cost-effective without
compromising the performance and schedule deliverables and it shall meet its
budget targets. The ICT infrastructure shall require no increase in support
headcount from the two posts planned.
The service availability periods, maximum
planned and unplanned downtime (cumulative and single instance), and other
performance metrics are stated within the related PID. In summary –
·
The service is planned to be available 24
hours a day, 7 days a week
·
The total maximum planned downtime per
quarter is 24 hours
·
The total maximum unplanned downtime per
quarter is 24 hours
·
The longest service outage, planned or
unplanned, shall be 12 hours
The ICT infrastructure
project should be completed as soon as possible and no later than six months
after contract sign-off with the main funding body, the Heritage Lottery Fund.
The implementation of the Information and
Communications Technology sub-project will be carried out by the sub-project
team.
The ICT sub-project will use Prince 2 project
management methodology and Microsoft Project.
1. Production
and development web services for SCAN
2. Office
Application services for SCAN
3. TLFA
and Archive Services Application Platform
4. Large
scale document digitisation and retrieval system
5. Trained
ICT support staff and internal users/developers
6. Year
2000 compliance assurance documentation and test results
7. Project
Work Breakdown Structure
8. Project
Requirements Definition (this document) and Microsoft Project98 plan
9. Project
Budget Spreadsheet
10. Procurement
plan with ITT schedules
The SCAN Information
and Communications Technology Infrastructure encompasses all hardware,
software, and services to support SCAN with the exception of the existing
network cabling in Thomas Thomson House.
·
Acquisition and support of the ICT
infrastructure for all SCAN activities
·
Co-ordination with the upgrade of the NAS
infrastructure to support SCAN activities
·
Provision of network elements (hubs,
switches, and similar devices) which, together with the existing cabling, will
form the SCAN network
·
Acquisition of any ICT-related elements
for associated projects 1-3 including all components of the digitising stations
·
Acquisition of a permanent link to the
Internet
·
Staff and user training for ICT-related
activities
·
Work to maintain or develop the NAS
infrastructure
SCAN is dependent on the continued
co-operation of its sponsors; the Heritage Lottery Fund, the National Archives
of Scotland, and the Genealogical Society of Utah.
The design of the SCAN infrastructure
could generate a significant increase in network traffic between the three main
NAS sites. Satisfactory performance of the SCAN network could depend on
sufficient bandwidth being available within NAS.
There is a requirement to integrate all
of the technology components and provide project consulting services to manage
its implementation according to specification and schedule.
See main PID. It is essential for the
smooth implementation of all the related projects that this ICT project
establish the essential infrastructure required for them to develop within 6
months of the date of the start of the project.
The provision and support of an ICT
infrastructure for SCAN is a continuous process. However, the specific ICT
project in support of the three main implementation projects at SCAN will be
deemed to have completed when the public web site is launched or the
large-scale digitisation process has been commissioned, whichever is the later.
1. Co-operation
regarding resource availability and agreed commitment to schedules from the
primary sponsors, the NAS and the Genealogical Society of Utah.
2. External
co-operation and commitment of suppliers to product and service delivery
schedules
See main PID
ICT sub-project:
The main project is split into four parts
(refer to main PID for further details). The project is designed to establish
the main infrastructure elements required to develop the remaining sub projects
and will therefore need to be in place quickly.
ICT Sub-Project
Sub-Project Team
Team Leader |
Grade B3 |
Mr Rob Mildren |
IT Development |
Grade B2 |
To be Appointed |
IT Support |
Grade B1 |
To be appointed |
This part of the project will be regarded
as a formal sub-project.
Senior Supplier |
Mr Rob Mildren |
Senior Supplier |
Mr David Brownlee (nb this may be
filled by the main supplier for the ICT procurement) |
Executive |
Dr Ishbel Barnes |
·
Ten times the rate of public enquiries
via email than the current rate (in April 99) of conventional mail enquiries to
NAS
·
Three times the rate of public enquiries
via email than the rate of conventional mail enquiries to the 45 participating
archives
A
project plan created using Microsoft Project95 is available. Version 1.1 of the
plan is associated with Version
1.1 of this document.
Sub-Project
team meetings will be held weekly. The sub-project team will produce highlight
reports ever two weeks.
Project
Board members will hold weekly progress meetings with team leaders.
Project
Board meetings will be held at the key stages indicated on the project plans.
1.
Where possible, SCAN will operate an IT
strategy similar to NAS which follows Scottish Office guidelines
2.
SCAN does not wish to use products at the
leading edge of technology preferring those with a track record in a production
environment. This is particularly relevant to storage media where proven
longevity is a primary requirement.
1. All
elements of the SCAN ICT platform must be compatible with the NAS ICT
infrastructure
2. The
implementation of the SCAN ICT platform must not disrupt the activities of the
NAS
3. The
procurement of products and services is based on Scottish Office guidelines
If
the monthly sub-project plan for ICT is not fulfilled the sub-Project Board
will report this to the Project Board along with proposals for returning the
project to the agreed plans.
Type of Risk |
Description of
Risk |
Probability (High/Low) |
Impact (High/Low) |
Risk Reduction Strategy [4] |
Risk Reduction Tactics |
|||
|
|
|
Perf |
Cost |
Time |
|
|
|
Resource |
Key project team members become unavailable |
Low |
High |
Low |
High |
Mitigate |
Ensure knowledge transfer and availability of
alternates |
Project Manager |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See main PID for further details about overall
communication strategy and plan.
Rob Mildren NAS (50% of working time)
Overall responsibility for all IT matters for
SCAN in particular
·
SCAN IS Strategy
·
ICT Infrastructure - specification,
procurement, performance and maintenance
·
IT Security Issues - develop policy for security
of access to SCAN IT facilities and the integrity and preservation of data
·
IT development and support work for SCAN
·
IT staffing issues and line manager for
SCAN IT staff
·
Keeping all the above integrated with
requirements of the NAS
·
Assist in procurement of digital cameras
·
Assist in procurement of Internet Server,
data storage and Communications
·
Develop systems to capture images and
metadata
·
Security of SCAN IT - implementing and
monitoring all appropriate security measures throughout the SCAN project
·
Implementation of TLFA and other Internet
projects
·
Web design and implementation
·
Keep abreast of, and advise on the
application in SCAN, of new technologies
·
Maintenance of SCAN IT
·
Support for SCAN staff IT
·
Assist in development of facilities for
data capture of SCAN material
·
Develop integrated Wills index and images
·
Develop facilities for Special Archive
Services
There is a requirement to integrate all of the
technology components and provide project consulting services to manage its
implementation according to specification and schedule.
The network will be based on Category 5 cabling,
Fast Ethernet media access and the TCP/IP protocol. There is a requirement to
install network hubs/switches specifically for SCAN.
Microsoft Windows NT4 will be used to provide
file and print services for office applications. Microsoft Office97, Exchange
5, and Internet Explorer 4 will form the core of the office applications.
Backup and restore services will be provided by software that is capable of
centralised management.
The precise number and type of servers are not
known at this stage; it is expected that several servers will host more than
one service. In all cases, any application software to provide the service
forms part of the requirement. The number of services required is as follows -
1.
File and print services for MS Office97
applications. The number of users will initially be 20 with a requirement to
accommodate 40.
2.
Primary domain controller (PDC) service
3.
Backup domain controller (BDC) service
4.
MS Exchange services. The number of users
will initially be 20 with a requirement to accommodate 40. It must have a link
to the NAS MS Mail system and a link to Internet mail.
1.
Web serving application – scalability is
the main requirement. The system should initially be sized for 10,000 web hits
per hour peak (say 3 per second), and three simultaneous file downloads
2.
TLFA (search) application – performance
is the main requirement. One search per second is the target throughput with an
average search time of 3 seconds. The initial database size including the
top-level catalogues of the 45 participating institutions is expected to be
around 2GB
3.
Image storage and presentation service –
scalability is the main requirement. The overall size of the image store will
be >1.3 TB when all 3,000,000 images are stored. However, over the period of
the digitisation project, which could last up to 3 years, there is certain to
be significant reductions in the cost of on-line storage. The initial
requirement is for 200GB of protected on-line storage (the type of protection
chosen can assume a predominantly read-only environment). This data storage
requirement must be considered as the initial component of a scaleable storage
infrastructure for SCAN which will eventually include binary, audio, and video
objects. If the requirement is fulfilled by a mixture of on-line, near-line,
and off-line storage sub-systems, then Hierarchical Storage Management (HSM)
software also forms part of the requirement
4.
Image print service – performance is the
main requirement. It must be possible to produce paper prints of images as fast
as the images can be made. There are at least two obvious solutions; a printer
per digitising station, or a centralised high-performance, networked printer
5.
Firewall service – scalability is the
main requirement. The system should initially be sized to match the load of the
web server and must be able to accommodate its’ level of scalability. The
Firewall service should be suitable to allow NAS the option of accessing the
GSI (Government Secure Intranet) in the future
6.
Ecommerce service – flexibility is the
main requirement. SCAN must be able to run all elements of it’s merchandising
operations either internally or externally or, more likely, a mixture of the
two. For example, fulfilment of digitised images is likely to be provided
directly from the SCAN system whereas fulfilment of books or leaflets is likely
to be performed by a third-party.
7.
Development and Test services. It must be
possible to develop and test SCAN services in a change controlled environment.
The requirement for web-authoring tools should be included in this component
8.
Management services. To include web
server resource management and management information, SNMP management, event
management, and software distribution to the desktop
9.
Backup/Recovery service. The requirement
is to centrally manage the backup and recovery of all services using one backup
application for all server types. The backup medium writing device can be
remote or local depending on the amount of data, the LAN bandwidth, and the
time available for backup.
If UNIX systems are to
be considered, there is an additional requirement for the proposed operating
system to interoperate with NT, particularly with regard to file sharing and
user directory maintenance.
The availability of
the customer-facing services is defined in section 2.3. In the cases where more
than one design option is available, preference shall be given to options which
provide a degree of redundancy and increased availability.
For reasons of security, ease-of-administration,
and in order to provide roaming profiles, Microsoft Windows NT4 shall be used
as the desktop operating system. The specification of the desktops shall be
optimised for 2D graphics performance. The minimum screen size shall be 17”.
There is a requirement to scan 3,000,000
archive-quality images within 3 years. This project will pay very high regard
to the preservation of these original, unique documents. Good handling
guidelines for the documents must be observed. All aspects of the digitisation
process, especially lighting and book handling, should be based on techniques
that have the lowest possible impact on the original documents.
Based on an average scan time of 45 seconds
including document handling and a seven-hour day this equates to 5358 days of
effort. Assuming a 48-week working year and a 5-day working week, 720 days of
time are available. Therefore 7.4 (5358/720) digitising stations are required,
effectively eight with some contingency. In summary, the requirement is -
1.
Eight scanning cameras mounted on
reprographic stands with lights, associated peripherals, interface cards and
cables
2.
Image capture software
3.
Eight workstations (meaning
reprographic/microfilming bed, lights, book cradles) to a specification
approved by SCAN
4.
Implementation services including
customisation of image capture software and the requirement for automatic print
facsimile output.
The digitising
stations will be capable of capturing and storing an image in less than 45
seconds including document movement from an adjacent ‘in-tray’ to an adjacent
‘out-tray’. The process steps are –
1.
On a regular (to be advised) basis the
equipment should be calibrated
2.
Move document from ‘in-tray’ and position
on book cradle on scanning table
3.
Check camera focus and adjust if
necessary
4.
Capture image and start image store
5.
Check image quality and filename while
image is being stored
6.
Move document from book cradle to
‘out-tray’.
It is assumed that
filename generation for a set of images (a multi-page document) will be
automated. It is also assumed that the need to re-focus for several images in a
series will be minimal and that in many circumstances, turning a page will take
the place of document movement saving a considerable amount of time. It is
preferable that the camera settings be software controlled, recordable and
capable of being uploaded to, or downloaded from, the camera
Each digitising
workstation must be capable of working normally either stand alone or as part
of a network.
Each digitising
station should have it's own data storage capacity suitable for at least 1.5
full day's imaging. This means that it should be capable of storing 1000 TIFF
files which will average 20 Mb each. Each digitising station should also
comprise a fast, high capacity backup device capable of offloading these
uncompressed images in a batch or unattended fashion to a suitable media with a
guaranteed life of at least 25 years.
There is a requirement
for a proof-of-concept stage where a single digitising station will be bought,
tested and commissioned in advance of the remaining seven.
There is a requirement for a permanent, reliable
Internet link in which the bandwidth can be increased at short notice. The link
must support Internet mail, ftp and high-bandwidth http.
There is a requirement to provide
1. IT
Support Staff Training
2. Office
Application User Training
The training requirements of the SCAN IT support
staff will be dependant on their experience and the nature of the systems
bought by SCAN. The nature of user training will be covered by –
1. Support
Staff Training: OS Training, management and backup application training
2. Customised
introductory internal user course to include -
WindowsNT navigation
Using Office97 applications
Using the Outlook email application
There is a requirement for a UPS which will
provide a minimum of 10 minutes protection (for services outlined in above)
against power outages and graceful closedown of systems where this period is
exceeded.
[1] The terms “user”, “supplier” etc. are those used in the PRINCE terminology
[2] Ideally, essential elements should include a good, broad mixture of the visual and the factual with an emphasis on basic helpful facts, user-friendliness and ‘What’s New’ so that users are aware of work in progress
[3] Formerly the Scottish Record Office, the name was changed in January 1999
[4] There are five risk reduction strategies – avoid, mitigate, plan contingency, transfer liability/ownership (only applicable to cost), and control (accept and manage residual)