Report to Heritage Lottery Fund
June 1999
Report No 4
Issues
Issue 99/1 Contracts
The
contract had not been signed the end of
the month, but was signed by the company
on 5 July and by the HLF on 6 July. This
issue is therefore resolved.
Issue 99/2 Request from
Participant Archives on Finding Aids
Resolved.
Issue 99/3 Cashflow
This
issue was discussed at the meeting with HLF evaluators at the meeting on 2 June
and proposals were made for resolving it by bringing forward expenditure from
other categories. Details are in the
report of the meeting, which is annexed to this report. The matter should,
however, be kept under review.
Issue 99/4 ICT Report
Following
the meeting on 7 April, Rob Mildren and
Seamus Ross discussed the report, and further comments on it were
promised. These have not been
received.
No
other issues have been identified at this time.
Progress
Top Level Finding Aids
The
detailed sub-project plan for the TLFAs was completed. There were informal contacts with a couple of
the participating archives who wished comments on how SCAN would compile TLFAs,
so as to assist those participating archives with identifying IT needs.
Special Archive Services
Project
The
detailed sub-project plan for Special Archive Services was completed. Team
leader Joanna Baird has begun work on designing the prototype for the Scottish
Archive Network web-site. And, working
towards this, she has also been learning about digital imaging and how to use
software packages such as Microsoft FrontPage
and Adobe Photoshop. Suggestions in
the weekly news for contributions to the SCAN web-site from participating
archives have resulted in some useful suggestions.
Testaments Project
The
detailed sub-project plan for Testaments was completed. Team leader, Hazel
Anderson, has started work on the testaments, checking them against existing
index entries, prior to having the indexes re-keyed for the database.
Peter
Dickson, chief conservator, has been using the newly designed database in
assessing the testaments and proposing treatment required prior to digital
capture. As a result, the number of fields in the database has been reduced and
a glossary of conservation terms added,
in order to streamline the pre-conservation process.
Preparations
for withdrawal of the St Andrews testaments from reader use early in August are
well in hand, in consultation with Reader Services Branch.
Throughput Reports
The
revised reporting methodology was incorporated in the revised Project
Initiation Document, sent to the evaluators and HLF on 18 June. The new methodology will now be instituted,
subject to any comments from HLF or evaluators.
Costs
With
contract signature now completed, the first drawdown request of £125,499.40 is
being made.
As
previously agreed, year one of project implementation will start on the day
following the day the contract comes into force (i.e. on 7 July 1999). All costs incurred up to that point will be
charged to year 0.
Staff
Total Staff Employed at
month end |
5 |
New Appointments |
0 |
Posts backfilled |
all |
|
|
Recruitment
of two conservators from outside NAS is now expected on 2 August and 14
September respectively.
The
press advertisements for 5 curatorial posts appeared on 2 July. Closing date for applications is 16 July.
Procurement
No
procurement during the reporting period.
No procurement is possible until the ICT report has been approved (see
Issue 99/4).
Participating Archives
No of Participating
Archives at month end |
45 |
Changes since last report |
0 |
Statistics on Use of Network
Facilities
Nothing
to report
Users
Nothing
to report
Project Board
No
meetings held.
13 July 1999
Annex 1
Notes of
Meeting with HLF, TTH, 2 June 1999
Present: Henrietta Ryott, Mike
Smethurst, Seamus Ross, Beverley Peters,
Chris Alexander, HLF; Ishbel Barnes, Rob Mildren, SCAN, George
MacKenzie, NAS.
|
|
Action |
1. |
Issues: 1.1
Contracts. a.
Participating Archives-SCAN.
Noted that reference to Heritage Lottery Fund in drafts should be to
National Heritage Memorial Fund. Agreed
that a schedule of minimum equipment requirements should be drawn up by SCAN,
and the advice of Tods Murray sought on whether this should be in the
agreement or a document apart. Agreed that the Project Initiation Document should
be used for project definition; Beverley will check that this is consistent
with the main contract between HLF and SCAN. Agreed that the requirement on participating
archives to retain equipment (Schedule, clause 4) should have no time
specified - this should be as agreed with SCAN. b. GSU-SCAN.
Noted that in 6.1 the consent of SCAN will mean the consent of more
than one director of the company. c. HLF-SCAN
Beverley had reviewed points with Lavinia. Grant Expiry date is OK. Access to the property clause is a standard
one, which HLF are not prepared to vary; it is implicit that access is
reasonable and to the appropriate parts of the premises only. SCAN will therefore accept this. Insurance is a requirement of the
agreement, and SCAN confirms that it can and will insure against employer
liability, public liability, and loss or damage to equipment. The requirement for SCAN to conclude an
escrow agreement was noted. Agreed the following timetable for finalising the
contracts: by Friday 4
June
final version of NAS-SCAN agreements will be e-mailed to Beverley; SCAN will also follow up GSU agreement; by Friday 11
June HLF
will respond with final comments on the agreements (if no GSU final version
available, will base on the latest version); by 22 June SCAN will produce final versions of all
agreements, arrange for signature of
NAS-SCAN and GSU-SCAN and provide copies to HLF; SCAN will also sign HLF-SCAN and present to
HLF; on 24 June HLF Trustees will sign HLF-SCAN. 1.2 Participating Archives Assistance with Finding
Aids. No further comments have been received, so
this will be considered resolved by the next meeting. 1.3 Cashflow.
HLF do not see a problem in helping SCAN overcome the forecast
difficulties, though it will require special permission, as it involves a
change to the normal rules. Advance payments
can be made on staff salaries and items of “other costs” provided that
details are given, and that documentation is supplied retrospectively. 1.4 ICT Report The delay was recognised, and Seamus will
meet with Rob immediately after this meeting to discuss the report. (Agreed that Seamus will report to Mike on
Thursday 3 June). 1.5 Responses to Proposals. SCAN noted the lack of responses to various
questions and proposals. Agreed that
Beverley will in all cases ensure a reply is sent within 2 weeks, though in
some cases this may be a holding reply, indicating when a substantive reply
will be sent. |
George Beverley George SCAN SCAN HLF SCAN HLF Seamus Rob |
|
|
|
2. |
Progress
Report 2.1 TLFAs
Agreed to send copies of the materials Alan Borthwick used in his
workshop session to Mike for information. 2.2 Special Archive Services Noted. 2.3 Testaments Agreed to send a copy of
the conservation assessment for St Andrews Commissariot to Beverley and to
Mike. Seamus advises contact with
Manfred Thaller at University of Bergen on digitising; Seamus will provide an
e-mail contact |
George George Seamus |
|
|
|
3. |
Throughput Copies of Gantt charts on the Special Archive
Services were tabled. Mike and Seamus
stressed the need for detailed resource information, and milestones that
include definable deliverables. Similar charts for the other project areas will be
produced as part of the PID. These
will be sent electronically to Beverley, who will print and distribute them
(Seamus and Mike cannot handle MS Project documents in electronic format). Agreed that project projections would be included
in the monthly report, showing progress against plans, and any under or over
performance. |
SCAN SCAN |
|
|
|
4. |
Costs SCAN will provide invoices to document requests
for drawdown. A monthly print out from
the SCOAP system, showing expenditure on the project will be produced, as a
means of reconciling payments. SCOAP
prints are generally at least one month in arrears. |
SCAN |
|
|
|
5. |
Staffing Nothing further to report. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
Procurement No
procurement to date. See 1.4 above. |
|
7 |
Participating Archives No changes. |
|
|
|
|
8. |
Statistics on Use Nothing
to report. |
|
|
|
|
9. |
Users Nothing to report. |
|
|
|
|
10. |
Project
Board Noted that the first meeting will take place once
the PID has been agreed by the HLF.
Agreed that the revised version will be submitted by SCAN to HLF by 18
June and that HLF will respond by mid-July. Following discussions at the PRINCE training
course, the Board membership will be kept to a minimum. |
SCAN HLF |
11. |
Next Meeting 13.00
on 11 August 1999 at Thomas Thomson House. |
|