|
Form PM3 ( Interim
Report2:
|
|
|
FORMAT OF PROGRESS REPORT |
|
|
|
||||||
|
(To be submitted by Grantee with each grant drawdown application, or at intervals no greater than 3 months) |
|
||||||||||
|
Form PM3(Part 2-Capital)
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Project Title: |
Scottish Archive
Network |
|
Project Ref No: |
DG-95-05231 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Name of Grantee: |
Scottish Archive
Network |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
As stated in the Monitoring Documents referred to in your Grant Contract, you are required to submit to NHMF a Progress Report with each grant drawdown application, or at maximum intervals of 3 months in the absence of an application, reporting on how the project is progressing towards meeting the Approved Purposes. The headings and format of the Report, addressing the principal monitoring criteria, are shown below. These headings and format must be followed, but you may prepare your Report using computer software incorporating spreadsheets as appropriate. All sections (expanded in size as necessary) are to be completed fully on each monthly report. (Use supplementary sheets if necessary). PM
forms should be returned in hardcopy and must be completed fully. Failure to
do so will delay processing your Grant |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Report No: |
17 |
|
Report Date: |
17 Aug 2000 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Covering Period: |
July 2000 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
1.
General Progress/ Programme and Project Objectives
Enter summary report on general
progress towards achievement of the Approved Purposes identifying any problems
or issues to which NHMF’s attention should be drawn. Note any actions proposed
in response to problems or particular areas of risk.
The project is within budget and is scheduled to be
completed on time. |
See annex 1 for detailed progress and throughput reports. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Partnership Funding
Enter progress towards securing
partnership funds
Source of
Funding |
Amount
expected (A) |
Amount
received to date (B) |
Balance
to come A-B) |
Date
balance expected |
NAS |
£425,967 |
£48,400 |
£377,567 |
Aug 2002 |
GSU |
£703,785 |
£41,117 |
£662,668 |
Aug 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,129,752 |
89,517 |
1,040,235 |
Aug 2002 |
Totals |
|
|
|
|
Explain
any changes to sources of Partnership Funding since the last Progress Report
|
|
|
3. Change Control
Enter requests for any material
change to the Approved Purposes which
have been approved by NHMF since the last Report and advise of any potential
requests for such change in the future.
Description of Change Item |
Date of request to NHMF |
Date of NHMF
response |
Effect on
achievement of Approved Purposes |
Effect on Programme |
Effect on Costs |
Change 2nd digital imaging post at present allotted to
Special Archive Services sub project (Grade B1) to extra curatorial post within TLFA sub project ( Grade B1) i.e no
change in finance just change of staff within sub projects. See appendix 2 |
18 July 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: NHMF Approval is required for any material change to the Approved Purposes
Report on any effect to delivery
of the Approved Purposes of any cost transfer between the principal cost
elements stated in your “Notification of Grant”. (Note: no such transfer is to
be made between capital and revenue elements, or between VAT and any other cost
element, without NHMF prior consent ).
Amount of cost transfer (£’000) |
Cost transfer from (cost element): |
Cost transfer to (cost element): |
Effect on delivery of Approved Purposes |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Review of Design Drawings and
Documentation
Enter any design reviews or
comments received from NHMF or its Project Monitors since your last report
Work element for which Design/Document review has been
carried out |
Date reviewed |
NHMF/Project Monitor’s comments (if any) |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Timetable/Programme
Enter progress compared with the
agreed Timetable/Programme for key activities
Grant Expiry Date:
Key
Activity or milestone |
Planned
completion date |
Actual
(or currently forecast)
completion date |
Variance |
Comment |
These are all to be reviewed 8 and 9 August and will be included in next
month’s report. See Annex 1 . |
|
|
|
|
The project remains on time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Project Completion |
|
|
|
|
6. Expenditure on Approved Costs
a)
Cost Control
Enter expenditure to date against
the key items of Approved Cost (i.e. the
costs on which NHMF has agreed to pay the Payment Percentage) compared with
that detailed in the pre-commencement documentation. (VAT and Contingencies to
be separately identified).
Items
of Approved Cost (Principal
cost elements) |
Approved Costs to completion as agreed at award |
Out-turn
Costs as currently forecast (A) |
Planned costs to date - as submitted with Form PM1 (B) |
Actual
costs to Date (C) |
Variance (C-B) |
Balance
of costs (A- C) |
Staff |
£2,170,889 |
£493,654 |
£493,654 |
£412,203 |
£-81,451 |
£81,451 |
Internet Server |
£449,700 |
£374,750 |
£374,750 |
|
£374,750 |
£374,750 |
Communication |
£51,222 |
£17,185 |
£17,185 |
£1,845 |
£-15,340 |
£15,340 |
Digitisation |
£349,191 |
£180,000 |
£180,000 |
£95,725 |
£-84,275 |
£84,275 |
Other |
£543,500 |
£204,050 |
£204,050 |
£102,192 |
£-101,858 |
£101,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingency |
£2,631,805 |
£63,483 |
£63,483 |
|
£63,483 |
£63,483 |
VAT |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
£6,196,307 |
£1,333,122 |
£1,333,122 |
£611,965 |
£155,309 |
£721,157 |
Note any significant changes to
the apportionment of costs between the principal cost elements prior to their
commitment. Note the effect of any such changes and confirm that they will not
affect the Approved Purposes including expected quality.
Cost transfer from : |
Cost transfer to: |
Amount (£) |
Effect of Transfer |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) Cash Flow
Enter the expected timing of
expenditure of the total Balance (A-C) calculated above and the funding sources
to cover the expenditure
|
To date |
Next Qtr |
2nd Qtr |
3rd Qtr |
4th Qtr |
5th Qtr |
Later |
Total to Completion |
Expenditure
of Approved Cost |
Enter Total of C above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter Total of
A above |
Funded
by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHMF |
£611,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
£1,333,122 |
Other source (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other source (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other source (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Funding (to equal Expenditure of Approved Cost) |
£611,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
£1,333,122 |
7. Procurement
Enter the current procurement
status of any significant goods, works, or services currently being procured
for the project, or awarded since the last Report.
Goods/Works/ Services
: brief description |
Approx
Value |
EU
procurement Applies? Yes./No |
No of
tenderers |
Date of
tender return |
Date of
award |
Selected
Contractor/supplier/ consultant |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identify any goods/works/services
not awarded to the lowest tenderer and provide reasons why the selected
supplier/consultant/contractor offered best value for money.
8. Property Ownership and Possession
Note
any evidence provided at the request of NHMF or the Project Monitor.
Property
Description and evidence provided |
Date
evidence provided to NHMF |
N/A |
|
|
|
9. Insurance
Enter the insurances you have
effected:
Cover |
Effective
From Date |
Expiry
Date |
Employer Liability Insurance |
21/10/99 |
20/10/00 |
Computer Insurance |
21/10/99 |
21/10/00 |
Office Insurance: Including Goods In Transit &
Officers Liability Insurance. |
21/10/99 |
21/10/00 |
10. Appointment of
Staff (Revenue Elements only, if
any)
List the salaried staff appointed (applicable to “Revenue” elements
of project only) since your last Report and the total number of volunteers
currently employed (if any).
a) Salaried
Staff (Note: applicable only to staff whose salaries are included as Eligible
Costs in the Approved project.
Position |
Date Appointed |
Job
Description sent to NHMF (Yes/No) |
Media in
which advert placed |
Employment Contract
to NHMF (Yes/No) |
Project Assistant |
04/07/00 |
Yes |
N/A |
To Follow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) Volunteer
Staff
The total number of Volunteer
staff employed at present is …………4……
(Details are provided with PM3 (Part1)
11. Statutory Consents
Enter the status of the principal
statutory consents required to complete the project
Consent
Required |
Granting
Authority |
Actual or
expected date of consent |
Planning |
N/A |
|
Listed Building |
|
|
Scheduled Monument |
|
|
Others |
|
|
12. Publicity and Grant Acknowledgement
Enter displayed acknowledgement,
press releases, or other publicity issued since the last report:
Description |
Date
Issued |
Approved
by NHMF (Yes/No) |
Displayed acknowledgement |
N/A |
|
Press Releases issued |
|
|
Publicity issued |
|
|
|
|
|
13. Photographic Records
Y
Confirm that you are making
photographic records of the project Y
14. Special Conditions
Indicate progress towards
satisfying the Special Conditions (if any) noted in the Contract:
No |
Special Condition |
Target Date for compliance |
Current Status |
|
See
pages 10-16 inclusive of HLF/ SCAN contract 6 July 1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Grantee: Scottish Archive Network
Address: Thomas Thomson House, 99 Bankhead Crossway North,
Edinburgh, EH11 4DX
Signed for Grantee: …Ishbel Barnes……………………………………………………..
Date: …………18/08/00……………….
First visits to the following archives were undertaken: Scottish Borders
Council Archive, Strathclyde University Archives, and Aberdeen City Archives
(including Aberdeenshire Archives). Of
these four, no TLFA creation work will occur at Aberdeen until Year 3 (and some
of the work will be undertaken by its staff), but work will (all being well)
begin at the other two either late this calendar year or early next.
TLFA creation work continued for West Lothian Council Archives and
Aberdeen University Library Special Collections Dept. Some “shell” entries (ie lacking most of the
data in the Scope & Content and Administrative/Biographical History
elements) have been made up for Orkney Archives and Highland Council Archive.
Alan Borthwick spoke to staff from two of NAS’s records cataloguing
branches about the division of responsibility for NAS TLFA creation between NAS
and SCAN staff. One other meeting was to
be held in early August, and a general review of the progress of such work is
scheduled for late September.
Further internal quality checking of initial draft TLFA entries for Angus
Archives and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow took
place. Comments, mostly positive, were
received back from the Falkirk Museums History Research Centre Archivist about
the first 100 or so TLFA entries which she had checked. No comments were received from Angus Archives
about the drafts sent to them for approval.
Clearly we shall need to ensure that we continue to badger (gently)
participating archives who have received draft entries for review if they do
not respond swiftly.
Preparations for an expected visit in early August by TLFA and IT staff
to Sweden to discuss the ARKIS II database were made, ARKIS being the expected
database to be used by SCAN.
The advert for John MacKenzie’s post is expected to appear in
mid-August. Because the post will not be
filled for perhaps a couple of months yet, there will be a spell of some weeks
while the project cannot proceed as swiftly as expected. The performance measures for the next month
or two will be adjusted to take account of the shortfall.
Joanna Baird took annual leave for 2 weeks in July and Robin Urquhart
took 1 week in July.
Robin Urquhart concentrated most of his efforts in July on compiling
place-related entries including – compiling a list of Scottish burghs, and
where to find their town council records, for the Knowledge Base. Robin also made a trip to Kyle of Lochalsh on
4 July, to carry out research for the forthcoming exhibition on the Highland
Railway, courtesy of Scotrail, one of the exhibition’s sponsors. During the course of this trip he visited the
Highland Archives on 5 July in Inverness to photograph documents for the
exhibition and the Knowledge Base, using the hand-held digital camera. Photographs from the collection of the
Scottish Film and Television Archive have been digitised and used to illustrate
the topic page and FAQs on Scottish cinemas. Iain McKenzie from the
Glasgow & West of Scotland Family
History Society and the SCAN Users Group asked for suggestions of practical
assistance with the SCAN project and Robin sent him a list of suggested tasks
on Monday 31 July.
Joanna Baird attended a seminar on ‘Increasing the Web Experience’ on
Tuesday 4 July and also held a meeting with the web design company, Multimedia
Incorporated, on Friday 7 July where the next design stage was discussed and
the navigation refined. It was agreed that the Discussion Forum and the
Knowledge Base were obvious priorities and should both appear in the near
future so that users and interested parties would have a focus to give feedback
on. Joanna received a revised timetable and payment schedule from Multimedia
and it was agreed that stage 1 could be effectively signed-off once the
navigation and site map were refined to the satisfaction of SCAN staff. Stage 2
would include the in-putting of information and SCAN staff would need to
resolve several issues regarding proposed database formats etc. Joanna held discussions with Ishbel Barnes
and Stuart Low on ways of promotion the SCAN site and disseminating information
about the project. It was agreed that further inter-team discussions should be
held, suggestions collated and a draft report prepared by Stuart Low. Joanna
Baird continued to update the newly-created ‘News Roundup’ micro-site on the
Internet.
Clive Birnie, the student research assistant has been helping both Joanna
Baird and Robin Urquhart with a variety of tasks since he began working for
SCAN on Tuesday 4 August.
Hazel Anderson was on annual leave for the first week of July, Margaret
Fox was on leave for three weeks from 17th July and Peter Dickson
for two weeks from the same date.
Throughput
Reports
|
June 2000
Predicted |
June 2000
Achieved
|
July 2000
Predicted |
Cumulative
totals
|
Topic Pages – drafted
|
3
|
6
|
6
|
29
|
Frequently
Asked Questions - drafted
|
4
|
0
|
4
|
84
|
Topic
Pages - quality-controlled
|
2
|
2
|
5
|
15
|
Frequently
Asked Questions - quality-controlled
|
4
|
4
|
0
|
41
|
The topic pages compiled were ‘places’ entries (one on Renfrewshire
county and five entries on burghs). In addition, five new contents pages for
the Knowledge Base were created.
|
July 2000- Predicted
|
July 2000 - Achieved
|
August 2000 - Predicted
|
Totals
achieved
|
TLFA initial
draft entries –drafted
|
250
|
400
|
300
|
3340
|
TLFA initial
draft entries - quality controlled
|
200
|
120
|
150
|
1290
|
TLFA
entries - revised
within SCAN
|
150
|
0
|
150
|
560
|
TLFA entries –
agreed by SCAN and part. archive |
200
|
74
|
200
|
169
|
Testaments Editorial
|
July 2000
Predicted |
July 2000
Achieved |
August 2000
Predicted |
Testaments
registers SC1/37/44-70,
SC49/31/27-69 SC20/50/10-27 |
|
|
|
Index entries
created
|
9000
|
8870
|
9000
|
Vols/Pages
numbered
|
20/22000
|
27/30916
|
10/11000
|
Testaments Conservation |
July 2000 Predicted |
July 2000 Achieved |
August 2000 Predicted |
Vols. assessed |
30 (CC8/8/81-110) |
0 |
0 |
Folios cleaned |
2500 |
1021 |
2500 |
Vols. paginated |
10 |
3 |
10 |
Folios conserved |
500 |
72 |
500 |
Vols.rebound |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Vols. completed |
10 |
3 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
Appendix 2
Extra curatorial
B1 post in Top Level Finding Aid sub project. (SCAN cost heading 2.5)
We have now looked at this cost heading and believe that we can pay for
an extra member of the sub project out of the already agreed costs. Unless we
hear from you to the contrary we will therefore now go ahead on this basis.
Second digital imaging post in Special
Archive Services.
The lack of need for this post remains. This change in circumstances has
arisen because the NAS has now itself acquired a digital imaging camera and
this was not anticipated in our original submission to the HLF. The work we
expected the second digital imager to carry out will therefore now be carried
out within the NAS and the results be made available to SCAN.
We would therefore suggest that the money made available in the existing
SCAN costs 2.9 be moved to a new budget heading, Casual Staff. Having finished
our internal first year review we believe there are various tasks which can be
carried out more economically than at B1 level. These are pagination, checking
of names in the name authority file and linking digital images to the
electronic catalogue. We would therefore suggest that these tasks be carried
out by casual staff paid for out of this new budget heading. This would in turn
allow the time of the B1 staff to be used more productively. These tasks relate
to all the sub projects, not just one. We therefore believe that for the
success of the project we now need this new budget heading which will allow us
this added flexibility.