|
|
Form PM3 ( Interim
Report2:
|
|
|
|
FORMAT OF PROGRESS REPORT |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
(To
be submitted by Grantee with each grant drawdown application, or at intervals
no greater than 3 months)
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Form PM3(Part 2-Capital)
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Project Title: |
Scottish Archive
Network |
|
Project Ref No: |
DG-95-05231 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Name of Grantee: |
Scottish Archive
Network |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
As stated in the
Monitoring Documents referred to in your Grant Contract, you are required to
submit to NHMF a Progress Report with each grant drawdown application, or at
maximum intervals of 3 months in the absence of an application, reporting on how the project is progressing
towards meeting the Approved Purposes. The headings and format
of the Report, addressing the principal monitoring criteria, are shown below.
These headings and format must be followed, but you may prepare your Report
using computer software incorporating spreadsheets as appropriate. All
sections (expanded in size as
necessary) are to be completed fully on each monthly report. (Use
supplementary sheets if necessary). PM forms should be returned in hardcopy and must be
completed fully. Failure to do so will delay processing your Grant |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Report No: |
48 |
|
Report Date: |
17 Apr 2003 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Covering Period: |
Mar 2003 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
1.
General Progress/ Programme and Project Objectives
Enter summary report on general progress towards
achievement of the Approved Purposes identifying any problems or issues to
which NHMF’s attention should be drawn. Note any actions proposed in response
to problems or particular areas of risk.
|
The
project remains within budget and is scheduled to be completed on time. |
|
See
annex 1 for detailed progress. |
|
See
annex 2 for update on special conditions. |
|
The
Project Performance Information is now held on the accompanying spreadsheet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Partnership Funding
Enter progress towards securing partnership funds
|
Source of Funding |
Amount expected (A) |
Amount received to date (B) |
Balance to come A-B) |
Date balance expected |
|
NAS |
£425,967 |
£170,122 |
£255,845 |
Oct
2003 |
|
GSU |
£703,785 |
£627,775 |
£ 76,010 |
Oct
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£1,129,752 |
£797,897 |
£331,855 |
Oct
2003 |
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
|
Explain any changes to sources
of Partnership Funding since the last Progress Report
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Change Control
Enter requests for any material change to the Approved
Purposes which have been approved by
NHMF since the last Report and advise of any potential requests for such change
in the future.
|
Description
of Change Item |
Date
of request to NHMF |
Date
of NHMF response |
Effect
on achievement of Approved Purposes |
Effect
on Programme |
Effect
on Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: NHMF Approval is required for any
material change to the Approved Purposes
Report on any effect to delivery of the Approved
Purposes of any cost transfer between the principal cost elements stated in
your “Notification of Grant”. (Note: no such transfer is to be made between
capital and revenue elements, or between VAT and any other cost element,
without NHMF prior consent ).
|
Amount
of cost transfer (£’000) |
Cost
transfer from (cost element): |
Cost
transfer to (cost element): |
Effect
on delivery of Approved Purposes |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Review of Design Drawings and
Documentation
Enter any design reviews or comments received from
NHMF or its Project Monitors since your last report
|
Work
element for which Design/Document review has been carried out |
Date
reviewed |
NHMF/Project
Monitor’s comments (if any) |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Timetable/Programme
Enter progress compared with the agreed
Timetable/Programme for key activities
Grant Expiry Date:
|
Key Activity or milestone |
Planned completion date |
Actual (or currently forecast) completion date |
Variance |
Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall
Project Completion |
|
|
|
|
6. Expenditure on Approved Costs
a) Cost Control
Enter expenditure to date against the key items
of Approved Cost (i.e. the costs on
which NHMF has agreed to pay the Payment Percentage) compared with that
detailed in the pre-commencement documentation. (VAT and Contingencies to be
separately identified).
|
Items of Approved Cost (Principal cost elements) |
Approved Costs to completion as agreed at award |
Out-turn Costs as currently
forecast (A) |
Planned costs to date - as submitted with Form PM1 (B) |
Actual costs to Date (C) |
Variance (C-B) |
Balance of costs (A- C) |
|
Staff
|
£2,170,889 |
£2,170,889 |
£2,170,889 |
£2,071,714 |
£ -
99,175 |
£ 99,175 |
|
Internet
Server |
£449,700 |
£ 449,700 |
£ 449,700 |
£ 103,370 |
£-346,330 |
£346,330 |
|
Communication |
£51,222 |
£ 51,222 |
£ 51,222 |
£ 56,089 |
£ 4,867 |
£ -4,867 |
|
Digitisation |
£349,191 |
£
349,155 |
£
349,155 |
£ 150,536 |
£
-198,619 |
£198,619 |
|
Other |
£543,500 |
£
543,500 |
£
543,500 |
£ 350,834 |
£-192,666 |
£192,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingency |
£ 335,498 |
£171,457 |
£171,457 |
|
£-171,457 |
£171,457 |
|
VAT |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
£3,900,000 |
£3,735,923 |
£3,735,923 |
£2,732,543 |
£
-1,003,380 |
£1,003,380 |
Note any significant changes to the apportionment of
costs between the principal cost elements prior to their commitment. Note the
effect of any such changes and confirm that they will not affect the Approved
Purposes including expected quality.
|
Cost
transfer from : |
Cost
transfer to: |
Amount
(£) |
Effect
of Transfer |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) Cash Flow
Enter the expected timing of expenditure of the total
Balance (A-C) calculated above and the funding sources to cover the expenditure
|
|
To
date |
Next Qtr |
2nd
Qtr |
3rd
Qtr |
4th
Qtr |
5th
Qtr |
Later |
Total
to Completion |
|
Expenditure
of Approved Cost |
Enter Total
of C above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter Total of A above |
|
Funded
by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHMF |
£2,732,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
£3,735,923 |
|
Other
source (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
source (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
source (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Funding (to equal Expenditure of Approved Cost) |
£2,732,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
£3,735,923 |
7. Procurement
Enter the current procurement status of any
significant goods, works, or services currently being procured for the project,
or awarded since the last Report.
|
Goods/Works/ Services : brief description |
Approx Value |
EU procurement Applies? Yes./No |
No of tenderers |
Date of tender return |
Date of award |
Selected
Contractor/supplier/ consultant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identify any goods/works/services not awarded to the
lowest tenderer and provide reasons why the selected
supplier/consultant/contractor offered best value for money.
8. Property Ownership and Possession
Note any evidence provided at
the request of NHMF or the Project Monitor.
|
Property Description and
evidence provided |
Date evidence provided to
NHMF |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
9. Insurance
Enter the insurances you have effected:
|
Cover |
Effective From Date |
Expiry Date |
|
Employer
Liability Insurance |
01/02/03 |
31/01/04 |
|
Computer
Insurance |
21/10/02 |
20/10/03 |
|
Office
Insurance: Including Goods In Transit & Officers Liability Insurance. |
01/02/03 |
31/01/04 |
10. Appointment of
Staff (Revenue Elements only, if
any)
List the salaried staff appointed (applicable to “Revenue” elements
of project only) since your last Report and the total number of volunteers
currently employed (if any).
a) 
Salaried Staff (Note:
applicable only to staff whose salaries are included as Eligible Costs in the
Approved project.
|
Position |
Date Appointed |
Job Description sent to NHMF
(Yes/No) |
Media in which advert placed |
Employment Contract to NHMF (Yes/No) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) Volunteer Staff
The total number of Volunteer staff employed at present is …………11…… (Details are
provided with PM3 (Part1)
11. Statutory Consents
Enter the status of the principal statutory consents
required to complete the project
|
Consent Required |
Granting Authority |
Actual or expected date of
consent |
|
Planning |
N/A |
|
|
Listed
Building |
|
|
|
Scheduled
Monument |
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
12. Publicity and Grant Acknowledgement
Enter displayed acknowledgement, press releases, or
other publicity issued since the last report:
|
Description |
Date Issued |
Approved by NHMF (Yes/No) |
|
Displayed
acknowledgement |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicity
issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Photographic Records
Y
Confirm that you are making photographic records of
the project Y
14. Special Conditions
Indicate progress towards satisfying the Special
Conditions (if any) noted in the Contract:
|
No |
Special Condition |
Target Date for compliance |
Current Status |
|
|
See Annex 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
of Grantee: Scottish Archive Network
Address:
Thomas Thomson House, 99 Bankhead Crossway North, Edinburgh, EH11 4DX
Signed
for Grantee: …Rob Mildren……………………………………………………..
Date: 17/04/03………………………….
Annex 1
Sub Project Reports
Progress:
Work on collection description creation continued in the following archives:
- National Library of Scotland
- Glasgow University Library Special Collections
- National Archives of Scotland
- Ayrshire Archives
- Fife Council Archives
- Mount Stuart Archives Trust
- St Andrews University Library
The last two were new starts this month.
Editing work took place on
- Glasgow City Archives
- NHS Greater Glasgow Archives
- Midlothian Council Archives
- Royal College of Surgeons Edinburgh
The internal review work on NHS Greater Glasgow, Mount Stuart Trust and Midlothian Council Archives was completed, and the data sent off to those Archives for comment. Internal review work in a number of other places is approaching completion.
Continued
testing of WeeArkis data migrated into CALM occurred. This permitted the start by mid-month of the
re-migration of our MS Access data into CALM (which was more or less
accomplished without a hitch, although some files remained to be tackled at the
month’s end); and some consideration was paid as well to the migration of data
from the HE Archives Hub. The current
set of Hub data was made available to us as SGML files, and some was tested for
potential migration. This will also
allow the matter of the purchase of CALM licences to be taken forward.
Training and
Outreach:
Alan Borthwick prepared a brief presentation on the state of play with this section’s work for the general participating archives meeting, 27 March. Information was also provided then about the CALM licence provision, by the SCAN IT staff member (Alex Holstead) who deals with that issue.
2. Internet Resources project
General:
Work continued on designing the Scottish Handwriting website and on
statistical and other reports on the SCAN website to aid decision making for
SCAN’s future. On 26th March the designer from Wark Clements
demonstrated the prototype Educational Resources micro-site and quality control
of the work will be carried out in late March and early April by SCAN staff,
SCAN Users Group members, and NAS Outreach and Education staff. Charles Kelham
continued to quality control the database of burghs for the SCAN Gazetteer.
Staff, training and outreach:
The vacant B2 post remained unfilled during March. Gary Young and Jim
Oakley attended a tour of General Register House for new NAS staff. During
March Robin Urquhart sat two ECDL exams, attended a meeting regarding the
future of the SCAN website and the External Relations branch of the NAS, and
the participating archives meeting on 27th March. Robin Urquhart,
the acting head of the Internet Resources project, reached the end of his
contract on 31st March, but continues to maintain the site pro
tem.
Digitisation:
Jim Oakley worked principally on copying existing images to the I drive
and digitising farm horse tax rolls (NAS, E326/10).
3. Testaments Project
Digitising of the
following 1876-1901 Sheriff Court testaments continues:
- Edinburgh
Inventories (SC70/1/177-408)
- Edinburgh Probates Resealed (SC70/6/1-83)
Digitising of the following Commissary Court warrants has started:
- Stirling (CC21/6)
Digitising of the following Commissary
Court warrants has been completed:
- St Andrews (CC20/6)
- Brechin (CC3/4)
Conservation:
Conservation was carried out by SCAN and NAS staff this month. Work on the Brechin and St Andrews Commissary Court Warrants (CC3/4 and CC20/6) was completed. Work on flattening the folded documents in Probates Resealed (SC70/6) was started.
Dagmar completed the project conservation
report.
Ann continued sorting the later warrants of Kirkcudbright Commissary Court (CC13/6/1-128), working her way backwards in time. She sorted and labelled warrants from 1773-1779.
She sleeved and repacked 5,208 Brechin and
Stirling Commissary Court warrants (CC3/4 and CC21/6). She also placed 4260
Stirling (CC21/6) warrants flat in gardees.
Editorial:
The GSU team completed index/image linking
of Stirling Inventories (SC67/36/1-66) and then started work on Aberdeen
Inventories (SC1/36/78-144) and Alloa Inventories and wills (SC64/42/16-22).
They continued paginating Edinburgh
Probates Resealed (SC70/6/1-83). Paginating of the early boxes is contingent
upon the documents being first flattened by Conservation.
Index/image linking by
the curatorial team continued as follows:-
Jane Hill began linking Brechin Commissary
Court registers (CC3/3/1-12, CC3/5/1-7). Nicola Mills completed linking the
registers of Hamilton and Campsie Commissary Court (CC10/5/1-14, CC10/7/1-5)
and Inverness Commissary Court (CC11/1/1-9) and began linking Stirling
Commissary Court registers (CC21/5/1-12)
Paul Hopkins completed the selection of Brechin Commissary Court warrants (CC3/4/1-38) and then helped Margaret Fox with the selection of warrants from Stirling Commissary Court (CC21/6/1-105). This task was completed.
Paul Hopkins resumed linking Edinburgh Commissary Court registers (CC8/8/1-152), and Margaret Fox linked two registers Of Wigtown Commissary Court (CC22/4/2-3)
Ralph Moffat linked registers from Glasgow Commissary Court (CC9/7/1-84) and worked on additions to the Famous Scots pages of www.scottishdocuments.com.
Work continued on assigning references to the index entries for the 1876-1901 registers.
Charles Kelham spent the final month of his
secondment with SCAN Internet Resources.
Staff, training
and outreach:
Dagmar Hinz, conservator, left on 21st March on completion of her contract with SCAN. Ann Gibson, preservation assistant, will be switching on April 1st to more general support tasks for the Testaments team and www.scottishdocuments.com. Ralph Moffat re-joined the team on 10th March.
Mr Kay and Mrs Jaci Smith arrived in Edinburgh on 28th March, in order to join the GSU team on 1st April. Mr Glenn and Mrs Lois Butterfield became full-time members of the GSU team and will replace Mr Norton and Mrs Gloria Chaston when they leave on 29th April.
A party of curatorial and IT staff from Royal Botanic Gardens Edinburgh visited the SCAN project on Wednesday 19th March, primarily to see the digitising process
Hazel gave a presentation on www.scottishdocuments.com at a forum about the proposed Scottish Family History Service at General Register office Scotland on Friday 21st March. She also gave a presentation on progress in the Testaments project at a meeting of the SCAN Participating Archives on Thursday 27th March.
Annex 2
HLF Special Conditions
|
1.1 |
Prior to commencing the Works the Grantee
will sign and complete all contracts required to enable the Grantee to
fulfill the Approved Purposes including all contracts with contractors and
professional advisers before the work to which such contracts relate is due
to commence. Each such contract shall
provide for the provision of the work or services contracted for on terms
which do not differ to a material extent (save as provided by this Contract)
from the terms (including appropriate provisions for a retention on practical
completion) that would be entered into by a reasonably experienced relevant
employer engaging parties to provide similar work or services for projects of
the size, value, complexity and prominence of the Approved Purposes. Any material divergence from such terms
requires the Approval of NHMF. |
Fulfilled. The Scottish Archive Network
follows all Scottish Executive procurement rules. This has been verified by
Mr J Grady, Chief Procurement Officer NAS. |
|
|
1.2 |
Prior to commencing the Works the Grantee
will sign and complete all contracts required to enable the Grantee to
fulfill the Approved Purposes including all contracts with contractors and
professional advisers before the work to which such contracts relate is due
to commence. Each such contract shall
provide for the provision of the work or services contracted for on terms
which do not differ to a material extent (save as provided by this Contract)
from the terms (including appropriate provisions for a retention on practical
completion) that would be entered into by a reasonably experienced relevant
employer engaging parties to provide similar work or services for projects of
the size, value, complexity and prominence of the Approved Purposes. Any material divergence from such terms
requires the Approval of NHMF. |
|
|
|
1.3 |
NHMF may reduce the Grant by such amount
as it thinks fit up to an amount which bears the same proportion to the
difference between the lowest tender price and the price of the tender
accepted by the Grantee as the Grant bore to the original cost of the
Approved Purposes if NHMF, in its absolute discretion, disagrees with the
reason given by the Grantee for not accepting the lowest tender. |
|
|
|
1.4 |
The Grantee agrees that it shall only
accept tenders that it believes in good faith will result in the Approved
Purposes being carried out to the standard prescribed by Special Conditions 2
and 9 of this Contract. |
|
|
|
2. |
The Grantee shall carry out the Works or
shall procure that the Works are carried out in a professional manner in
accordance with currently accepted best practice in the Information
Technology industry. The Grantee will
ensure that best practice or proven and widely adopted standards are applied
especially in the areas of project management, requirements analysis, system
or application, design, testing, documentation, installation and maintenance
and in the area of the preservation of digital materials. |
SCAN believes that it is carrying out the
Works and procuring the Works in a professional manner in accordance with
currently accepted best practice in the Information Technology industry |
|
|
3. |
Prior to commencing the Works the Grantee
shall secure to NHMF’s satisfaction all necessary planning permissions
building consents and statutory approvals. |
Fulfilled |
|
|
4. |
Prior to commencing the Works the Grantee
shall prepare a detailed cost plan for carrying out the Approved Purposes in
a format which has been agreed in advance by NHMF and shall submit the same
to NHMF for Approval. Thereafter the
Grantee shall spend the Grant and other funds provided for the Approved
Purposes only in accordance with the Approved cost plan (“the Cost
Plan”). The Grantee must obtain prior
written Approval for any changes in expenditure which are not in accordance
with the details of the Cost Plan and in particular for movement of funds
between the various elements of the Cost Plan. |
Detailed cost plan submitted and agreed with the HLF. No changes in expenditure have been made
without prior written approval. The budget has been updated following the PID
review and a report detailing the variations form the original budget
estimates has also been submitted for discussion with the HLF at our next
quarterly meeting |
|
|
5. |
Prior to commencing the Works the Grantee
shall prepare a draft monthly project report form and a draft monthly cash
flow report form and shall submit the same to NHME for Approval. Thereafter the Grantee shall submit signed
monthly reports in the Approved forms to NHMF until the Approved Purposes have
been fulfilled. |
Signed monthly project reports and
monthly cash flows are submitted to the HLF |
|
|
6. |
Prior to commencing the Works the Grantee
shall submit to NHMF for Approval a revised and updated programme for the
Project. For the avoidance of doubt the
Programme shall contain details of the works to be carried out at the
development stage. The Grantee shall
only carry out the Works in accordance with the Approved programme (“the
Programme”) or any modification thereof Approved by NHMF. |
The Project Initiation Document (PID) was
submitted to the HLF as requested. The revised PID has also been submitted
and discussed with the HLF |
|
|
7. |
The Grantee will effect and maintain (or
will procure the effecting and maintenance of) during the Works construction
and project insurance of the project on terms which note the interest of and
are Approved by NHMF. |
Insurance has been obtained and full
details given to the HLF. Any renewal notices will automatically be dealt
with by SCAN |
|
|
8. |
Prior to issuing invitations to tender
the grantee shall prepare a report on the information and communication
technology to be installed at the Property pursuant to the Approved Purposes
and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing the report shall
include:- |
An ICT report was prepared and the
tendering process undertaken as agreed. The ICT infrastructure is now in
place and has been paid in full. The next requirement will be to increase the
data storage capacity as the digital imaging workflow increases |
|
|
8.1 |
a feasibility report |
|
|
|
8.2 |
the specification for the Digital
Deliverables |
|
|
|
8.3 |
the design of the system which shall in
particular include details of all interactives |
|
|
|
8.4 |
the proposals for the purchase of network
infrastructure. |
|
|
|
|
On receipt of Approval for the report
(“the ICT Report”) the Grantee shall prepare invitations to tender and tender
evaluation criteria for such works and shall submit the same to NHMF for
Approval. Thereafter the Grantee shall
issue invitations to tender in accordance with the Approved tender
invitations and evaluation criteria. |
|
|
|
9. |
The Grantee shall carry out the
information and communication technology works in accordance with currently
accepted best practice in the Information Technology industry. The Grantee will ensure that best practice
or proven and widely adopted standards are applied especially in the areas of
project management, requirements analysis, system or application
specification, design testing, user and system documentation, installation
and maintenance and in the areas of the preservation of digital materials. |
SCAN believes it has fulfilled and is
fulfilling this condition |
|
|
10. |
The Grantee shall submit to NHMF for
Approval details of the standards that the Grantee intends to implement. |
SCAN has submitted to the HLF its draft
cataloguing standards |
|
|
11.1 |
Prior to commencing the Works relating to
the information communication and technology the Grantee shall submit to NHMF
for Approval a report for the safeguarding and enhancement of, and public
access to, the Property including without limitation its proposals for: |
|
|
|
|
a) such
testing as may be necessary to demonstrate that the Digital Deliverables and
capable of fulfilling the Approved Purposes |
Schedule of Requirements for the Supply
of Digital Cameras |
October 1999 |
|
Information and Communications Technology
Requirements |
March 1999 |
||
|
Information and Communications Technology
Tender Document |
February 2000 |
||
|
Test plan submitted for installation of
ICT equipment |
October 2000 |
||
|
Data Capture Specification for Indexes |
November 1999 |
||
|
Website design specification |
November 1999 |
||
|
|
b) such
evaluation as may be necessary to demonstrate that the Digital Deliverables
are capable of fulfilling the Approved Purposes |
Evaluation and
selection criteria for ICT equipment submitted in evaluation report “SCAN ICT
Requirements Tender Report” |
April 2000 |
|
Book Cradle
Evaluation |
July 2000 |
||
|
Web Site Tender
Evaluation |
January 2000 |
||
|
Camera
Evaluation for HLF |
May 2000 |
||
|
Resolution
Requirements for Testaments |
May 2000 |
||
|
Data Capture
Tender Evaluation |
December 2000 |
||
|
|
c) the
preservation and security of all data and other material collected or
created in the course of carrying out
the Approved Purposes by the keeping of back-up copies of the Digital Deliverables and
otherwise; |
Weekly backups
and daily incremental backups take place for all SCAN information (excluding
images) |
April 2001 |
|
Uncompressed TIFF images are written to
DLT and stored locally |
November 2000 (and ongoing) |
||
|
Compressed JPEG images are written to the
Internet Server where a backup is taken weekly |
November 2000 (and ongoing) |
||
|
|
d) the
form of licence(s) to be used by the Grantee permitting third party
exploitation of the Intellectual Property; |
This was included as part of the contract
negotiations with the Genealogical Society of Utah. The HLF have a copy of
this document July 1999 |
|
|
|
e) the
form(s) of assignment(s) consent(s) waiver(s) licence(s) or permission(s) to
be used by the Grantee for the securing of third party rights in the
Intellectual Property; |
|
|
|
|
f) error
correction, maintenance and updating of the Digital Deliverables |
Data flow diagram of the digitisation
process available May 2001 Proposed data flow for the maintenance of
distributed data for the online catalogues available from May 2001 |
|
|
|
g) user
manuals or instructions and interfaces for the Digital Deliverables and its
use. |
All manuals
received for ICT equipment and standard operation of digital cameras Additional operator manual developed with
GSU for the use of the digital camera. ser manual produced in association
with the GSU for the installation, maintenance and delivery of digital
imaging in June 2000 Guidelines for capture of fonds level
descriptions produced by SCAN in September 2000 |
|
|
|
Thereafter the Grantee shall submit
signed monthly written reports in the form agreed with NHMF and show the
progress made in relation to the above matters. The Grantee must obtain prior written
Approval for any changes in the proposals which are not in accordance with
the Approved reports |
|
|
|
11.2 |
On receipt of Approval of such proposals
or monthly reports the Grantee shall implement such proposals in carrying out
the Approved Purposes. |
|
|
|
12.1 |
Prior to commencing the Works relating to
the information communication and technology the Grantee shall submit to NHMF
for Approval a report on the hardware technology to be used with the Digital
Deliverables (“the Hardware”) including without limitation its proposals for: (a) such
testing as may be necessary to demonstrate that the Hardware is capable of fulfilling the Approved Purposes; (b) such
evaluation as may be necessary to demonstrate that the Hardware is capable of fulfilling the Approved
Purposes; (c) error
correction, maintenance and updating of the Hardware; and (d) user
manuals and instructions for the Hardware and its use. Thereafter the Grantee shall submit
signed monthly written reports in the form agreed with NHMF and show the
progress made in relation to the above matters. On receipt of Approval of the said monthly
reports the Grantee shall implement the reports in carrying out the Approved
Purposes. The Grantee must obtain
prior written Approval for any changes in the proposals which are not in
accordance with the Approved reports. |
A presentation
and report covering the entire ICT requirements for the project was given |
May 2000 |
|
Information and
Communications Technology Requirements |
March 1999 |
||
|
Information and
Communications Technology Tender Document |
February 2000 |
||
|
Test plan
submitted for installation of ICT equipment |
October 2000 |
||
|
Data Capture
Specification for Indexes |
November 1999 |
||
|
12.2 |
On receipt of Approval of such proposals
or monthly reports the Grantee shall implement such proposals in carrying out
the Approved Purposes. |
|
|
|
13. |
The Grantee shall enter into a deposit
agreement with a third party Approved by NHMF for all Digital Deliverables
and any associated or necessary software and applications and shall
thereafter deposit escrow copies of the said Digital Deliverables on a basis
to be agreed with NHMF. |
Escrow discussed
for deposit of digital images. SCAN has a contract clause with GSU to provide
mutual restore and backup of digital images |
Early
discussions held with NCC Follow Up
Required |
|
14. |
The Grantee shall ensure that all
applications and software necessary to access use or present the digital
deliverables are transferable to a third party. |
Escrow discussed
for deposit of any software packages |
Early
discussions held with NCC Follow Up
Required |
|
15 |
The Grantee agrees that it shall take all
reasonable steps to mitigate to NHMF’s satisfaction the amount of VAT payable
upon, or to recover the VAT payable upon, or to recover the VAT attributable
to, the cost of fulfilling the Approved Purposes. The Grant shall be reduced by an amount
which bears the same proportion to the VAT not payable or recovered as the
Grant, prior to such decrease, bore to the original costs of the Approved
Purposes. |
SCAN has fulfilled this condition: VAT is fully recovered. |
|
|
16 |
At the end of Year 1 the Grantee is to produce a policy statement to support the extensibility of membership of Scottish Archive Network Limited with no financial implications. |
SCAN supports the extensibility of
membership of the Scottish Archive Network with no financial implications.
Currently there is an interest shown by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of
Glasgow Archives for inclusion |
|
|
17 |
The Grantee will effect and maintain (or
will procure the effecting and maintenance of) during the Works construction
and project insurance for the Project on terms which note the interest of and
are Approved by NHMF. |
SCAN has fulfilled this condition |
|
|
18 |
The documents required to be submitted or
provided to NHMF under these special conditions, are required to be submitted
or provided by the Grantee only for NHMF’s own purposes in connection with
the Grant and NHMF’s approval or acceptance of such documents cannot be taken
as approval or acceptance for any other purpose. |
This is accepted by SCAN |
|
|
|
19. [Clause
to go in here annexing contracts between a Scottish Archive Network Ltd and others] |
|
|
|
20 |
The Grantee shall take account of any
representations which NHMF may make with regard to the carrying out of the
Approved Purposes in accordance with the Programme, Design, specification,
Cost Plan, ICT Report and the contracts referred to in special conditions
1.1. In particular the Grantee shall
take account of any representations which NHMF may make prior to the issue of
a certificate of practical completion of the Works and shall pass such
representations on to the person authorised to sign a certificate of
practical completion. |
This is accepted by SCAN |
|
|
21 |
Without prejudice to the generality of
Clause 13.2 of this Contract NHMF may at any time appoint by notice in
writing to the Grantee a third party (“the Lead Monitor”) to monitor the
progress of the Approved Purposes and additional monitors to advise on
specialist matters arising from the implementations regarding the Approved
Purposes the Grantee shall take such reasonable steps as may be necessary to
comply with the recommendations. |
This is accepted by SCAN |
|
|
22 |
Prior to commencing the Works the Grantee
shall secure to the satisfaction of NHMF all the additional funding required
to complete the Approved Purposes. |
The additional funding required by the
HLF was secured. Budget projections supplied to HLF in March 2001 indicate
that the project will complete within budget and with the agreed percentage
of partnership funding |
|